Keith you said:
Bach was one of the greatest geniuses of all
time. But he was also capable
of a bit (and probably a lot) of hanky-panky in the organ loft with the
girls, out of sight of the priest and congregation, whenever he had the
opportunity. He was human as well.
of a bit (and probably a lot) of hanky-panky in the organ loft with the
girls, out of sight of the priest and congregation, whenever he had the
opportunity. He was human as well.
What I was trying to say in my previous post is
that the human species is
both capable of the most exquisite creativity and of the greatest savagery.
I was also in tears a couple of evenings ago when I saw on TV the rubble
that the Israelis had produced in the Palestinian camps.
both capable of the most exquisite creativity and of the greatest savagery.
I was also in tears a couple of evenings ago when I saw on TV the rubble
that the Israelis had produced in the Palestinian camps.
Sorry Keith, I don't get the analogy.
How does the softest of moments given to humans relate to the warrior
needs? Are you thinking of sex as conquest?
I don't agree. Or I don't understand. Fill me in.
Ray
