There are many complaints about the 1960s amongst the conservative press.   Drug culture and all of that, but what they refuse to remember is the civil rights issues of the pre-drug era that created such cynicism when America ran head on against its ideals of equality.   
Somehow that same language is coming round again.     You can't legislate morality but America's religions can't claim righteousness no matter whose son their doorway to the top happens to be unless there is correct action.    We are in a corporate war over these things.     And unfortunetely it is still being played by the same players as the civil rights of 1954 in Little Rock.     As long as the South believes that monogamy = righteousness and that theft and tyranny are lesser sins than having a concubine we will continue to be at war with each other.    And it IS a class war in my opinion,  I agree with Pat Buchanon on that)  but the new Republicans (former Dixiecrates)  have declared it with their greed and their insecurity.
Unfortunately the old Republican Party, the Party of Lincoln and that led down to Judge Walsh is dead.   What we now have is the coalition of Dixiecrats and Nixonian pragmatists that have created a majority out of the worst elements of the old segregationist /socialist Democratic Party that now calls themselves Neo-conservative born again Republicans.    They talk like Socialists, listen to Dick Armey both he a Phil Gramm use the language of Pravda laden Socialist Realism,  they walk like Socialists except it is now the government of big business and the only ones allowed to vote are stockholders (just like the only one's allowed to vote were Party Members)  and they are now cheating the Stockholders just like the Apparatchiks in the old Soviet Union stole from everyone.   If it walks like a Duck, it doesn't matter what you call it ultimately although you might get away with calling it an elephant for a while.
Cousin REH 
 
July 11, 2002

Suffer the Children

By BOB HERBERT

This year's N.A.A.C.P. convention may be in the president's home state of Texas, but anyone who expected a courtesy call from George W. Bush was mistaken.

This is not a president who is interested in what one of the convention's participants referred to as "the woes of black folks."

That may be a blessing. The Bush men, father and son, are seldom more cynical than when they get it into their mischievous heads to rev up some support among black people. George the First could hardly contain a devilish smile as he gave us Clarence Thomas, a gruesome acolyte of Antonin Scalia who has spent much of his time on the Supreme Court taking a pickax to black interests.

George the Second, during his oxymoronic compassionately conservative campaign for president, hijacked the copyrighted slogan of the Children's Defense Fund, "Leave no child behind." As he campaigned from coast to coast, hugging black children wherever they could be found, Mr. Bush went out of his way to give the impression that while he was a hard-liner on fiscal issues and defense, he could be a softie when it came to education and other issues of crucial importance to children.

Well, he's not a fiscal hard-liner. (Have you looked at the red ink in the budget?) And he's hardly an advocate for children.

The Children's Defense Fund, for which the slogan has real meaning, has been working with Citizens for Tax Justice to spotlight the inequitable treatment children are receiving in the Bush tax-cut environment.

Millions of American children are facing such serious issues as substandard housing and homelessness, inadequate and crumbling schools, and restricted access to health care, even as the money that might help alleviate some of these ills is being squandered on tax cuts that are scandalously huge — and growing!

An analysis of the Bush tax cut released jointly by Citizens for Tax Justice and the Children's Defense Fund found that while the wealthiest Americans "have already received a hefty down payment on their Bush tax cuts — averaging just under $12,000 each this year — 80 percent of their windfall is scheduled to come from tax changes that won't take effect until after this year, mostly from items that phase in after 2005."

For the vast majority of Americans, three-quarters of the Bush tax cuts — averaging about $350 this year — are already in place, the study said.

From 2001 through 2010, "the richest Americans — the best-off 1 percent — are slated to receive tax cuts totaling almost half a trillion dollars. The $477 billion in tax breaks the Bush administration has targeted to this elite group will average $342,000 each over the decade."

The clincher: "By 2010, when (and if) the Bush tax reductions are fully in place, an astonishing 52 percent of the total tax cuts will go to the richest 1 percent, whose average 2010 income will be $1.5 million."

Kids don't stand a chance in that environment. Marion Wright Edelman, president of the Children's Defense Fund, put the matter well: "The Bush administration's words say, `Leave no child behind.' The Bush administration's deeds say, `Leave no millionaire behind.' "

The truth is that the "woes of black folks" are for the most part the everyday struggles faced by the majority of poor and working-class Americans, including many who are considered, statistically, to be middle-class.

The problems linked to overburdened and underfunded school systems are not limited to the inner cities. Inadequate housing and a lack of affordable health care are major issues for millions of American families, across the board. So is the difficulty of finding adequate and affordable child care. But these are not matters that grab Mr. Bush's attention and move him to action.

"Follow the money," said Ms. Edelman, "and you will find what we truly care about and stand for as a nation."

When Mr. Bush is insensitive to the needs and the aspirations of black Americans, it's a reflection of his insensitivity to the interests of all working Americans. The N.A.A.C.P. is a far from perfect organization. But the anger coming out of its convention in Houston shows that it's still sharp enough to recognize the difference between compassion and cynicism, and to see the threat inherent in a president who will leave no millionaire behind.


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Permissions | Privacy Policy

Attachment: t.gif
Description: GIF image

Attachment: pixel.gif
Description: GIF image

Reply via email to