Brad McCormick wrote: > I've been listening to different news. I've heard he had > let the insurance lapse or something like that, but > that he got the insurance company to pay anyway.
He didn't let it "lapse", it's just that the insurance was so new that it was not yet valid (the details had not been completely negotiated). Btw, this is not hearsay, but from the official court document on the lawsuit: http://news.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/terrorism/swissrecmpt102201.pdf You can also find the story in the insurance press. > And, as for 2 attacks, his insurance presumably has > a per incident max payout, so 2 incidents may > mean double bucks. Exactly, the double payout is the reason why Silverstein insists that 9/11 counts as _two_ incidents. The lawsuit about this is still pending. Chris P.S.: I'll be out of town Saturday.
