Ok.  Agree to disagree and wish Slick Willie, oops, Pres. Clinton a good
life.

On to more important things, like the future of work.

arthur

-----Original Message-----
From: Karen Watters Cole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 6:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Cordell, Arthur: ECOM
Subject: RE: Lets agree to disagree and hope for the best (An Uncertain
Presidency An Uncertain Time)


Dear Arthur: it might not have been about sex as far as you are concerned,
but if you ask the average person on the street who still seethes over the
Clinton impeachment and its failed attempt to remove him from office, the
issue is sex and the denial of sex; the grand jury issue is not the primary
focus.  If it were, I think there would be more political and legal
ramifications and fewer pop culture ones.
Where Clinton failed was not to collapse his strategy when it became
apparent during the grand jury testimony that Starr et al were entrapping
him.
It reinforces what your mother told you about one lie leading to another but
the "bottom line" where so many people like to think is that this was about
sex in the oval office, and public opinion was greatly enflamed by a lot of
talk radio and smug sermonizing.  It's not the first use of smut in
politics, here in the US or anywhere else. In my opinion, most people did
not understand the legal issues, nor the entrapment.  Unfortunately.
No matter that Warren Harding may have had sex with a minor in a closet of
the WH and produced a child from it, or LBJ had sex on the desk with a
secretary, or the JFK might have (in the White House) or that both Nixon and
Bush the Elder were reported to have a Chinese mistress and the American
wife of a military attach� who later worked in his VP offices and
accompanied him on state visits, respectively.  These were left as rumors in
those days and not treated as public information.  All that has changed now,
thanks to that blasted conservative millionaire who funded the original
detective work on Whitewater, the repentant David Brock, the unrepentant Ken
Starr and the rest of the Keystone Cops.
So you shouldn't be surprised to read me blasting the hypocrites in office
today when they are similarly caught in ethics tsunamis like Enron or
'lapses of character' like Rep. Tim Hutchinson (who may lose reelection in
Ark, due to his divorce and quick remarriage after playing country preacher
along with his brother Asa* during the Impeachment), calling upon the good
people of the church to stand by them, just after they have condemned to
hell those sinners they didn't succeed in ousting on Election Day. And it in
no small way explains the enjoyment I get dishing it right back at them the
way they deserve to get it themselves now.  If you live by the sword, you
will die by the sword.

AC You can't run a nation on a wink and a nod.  (Yes you can. Just ask
Kissinger)

AC It was not about sex.  (Right.  And Ariel Sharon's current politics have
nothing to do with the possibility of his being charged as a war criminal in
Belgium.  Which, by the way, I don't think will happen.  On the other
hand...)

Again, I'm sorry I brought this up several days ago, because there are more
serious disagreements in hand today, but it is obvious that even among this
group, there are still gritted teeth.  It's hard to tell if it will be as
lasting or trigger cause and effects the way Watergate did among voters, but
it most certainly changed the way the media and the public expect to hear
personal information about candidates and gov't officials.  It already
caused the decline of the Independent Prosecutor, so what else?  What used
to be none of anyone's business is now par for the course, and we will
continue to lose good people who could make a valid contribution out of fear
of Salem witch hunts & media trials.  I guess some of the lingering anger is
that Clinton is the focus of the condemnation when there are a host of
guilty parties in this drama who contributed to what should have been a cut
and dried issue to become a muddy chapter in our nation's life and a
terrible distraction from the important job at hand. Beware of Taliban in
suits.
Hope the weather up there is beautiful. The seasons are changing here
already, but not like the East Coast. Too many evergreens. - Karen

* and wasn't it convenient for Asa that Bush appointed him to the DEA so he
wouldn't have to face reelection like the man in S. CA who lost? Can you
blame Katherine Harris for thinking she'd get an ambassadorship to Bermuda
for her loyal efforts?

Reply via email to