Chris,

Are you against patents?

This isn't a trick question. I am completely against them.

Harry
________________________________________

Christoph wrote:

>Keith Hudson wrote:
> > some African politicians have been frightened enough to prevent GM grain
> > being imported by the aid agencies in order to cope with wide-scale
> > starvation among their people -- even though, within the stomach, the
> > variant genes within GM food are broken down and digested as thoroughly
> > as all the others and are of absolutely no danger.
>
>This statement is misleading in several ways.  First, it is not just
>"frightened politicians", but also informed experts (see forward below).
>Second, the issue is not the digestion of "the variant genes", but
>of proteins produced by the variant genes.  It's much too early to
>state that these "are of absolutely no danger."
>
>Btw, the latest edition of New Scientist (19 Sept 2002) reports that
>the UN has been slipping GM food into food aid for the last 7 years,
>without informing the recipient countries, and often in breach of
>national regulations.  The GM corporations are taking advantage of
>poor people's misery to dump their unwanted GM stuff on human guinea pigs.
>
>Chris
>
>
>
>
>__________________________________FWD__________________________________
>"LET NATURE'S HARVEST CONTINUE"
>Statement from all the African delegates (except South Africa) to FAO
>negotiations on the International Undertaking for Plant Genetic Resources,
>June 1998 [published in the European media in late July 1998]
>
>(Document begins)
>During the past few weeks European citizens have been exposed to an
>aggressive publicity campaign in major European newspapers trying to
>convince the reader that the world needs genetic engineering to feed the
>hungry. Organised and financed by Monsanto, one of the world's biggest
>chemical companies, and titled "Let the Harvest Begin", this campaign gives
>a totally distorted and misleading picture of the potential of genetic
>engineering to feed developing countries.
>We, the undersigned delegates of African countries participating in the 5th
>Extraordinary Session of the Commission on Genetic Resources, 8 - 12 June
>1998, Rome, strongly object that the image of the poor and hungry from our
>countries is being used by giant multinational corporations to push a
>technology that is neither safe, environmentally friendly, nor economically
>beneficial to us.
>It is time to look at some of the facts about the company behind this
>campaign:
>Monsanto is one of the world's largest pesticide companies. During the past
>two years only it spent over US$6000 million to take control over other seed
>and biotechnology companies and is now the major industrial player in this
>field. Its major focus is not to protect the environment, but to develop
>crops that can resist higher doses of its best-selling chemical weedkiller
>"Roundup".
>Rather than stretching a helping hand to farmers, Monsanto threatens them
>with lawsuits and jail. In the USA, the company employs detectives to find
>and bring to court those farmers that save Monsanto soybean seeds for next
>year's planting. Backed by patent law, the company demands the rights to
>inspect the farmers' fields to check whether they practise agriculture
>according to Monsanto conditions and with Monsanto chemicals.
>Rather than developing technology that feeds the world, Monsanto uses
>genetic engineering to stop farmers from replanting seed and further develop
>their agricultural systems. It has spent US$18000 million to buy a company
>owning a patent on what has become known as Terminator Technology: seed that
>can be planted only once and dies in the second generation. The only aim of
>this technology is to force farmers back to the Monsanto shop every year,
>and to destroy an age old practice of local seed saving that forms the basis
>of food security in our countries.
>In "Let the Harvest Begin" the Europeans are asked to give an unconditional
>green light to gene technology so that chemical corporations such as
>Monsanto can start harvesting their profits from it. We do not believe that
>such companies or gene technologies will help our farmers to produce the
>food that is needed in the 21st century. On the contrary, we think it will
>destroy the diversity, the local knowledge and the sustainable agricultural
>systems that our farmers have developed for millennia and that it will thus
>undermine our capacity to feed ourselves.
>In particular, we will not accept the use of Terminator or other gene
>technologies that kill the capacity of our farmers to grow the food we need.
>We invite European citizens to stand in solidarity with Africa in resisting
>these gene technologies so that our diverse and natural harvests can
>continue and grow.
>We agree and accept that mutual help is needed to further improve
>agricultural production in our countries. We also believe that Western
>science can contribute to this. But it should be done on the basis of
>understanding and respect for what is already there. It should be building
>on local knowledge, rather than replacing and destroying it. And most
>importantly: it should address the real needs of our people, rather than
>serving only to swell the pockets and control of giant industrial
>corporations.
>
>NAME:
>Jean Marie Fodoun, Cameroun
>George A. Agbahungba, Benin
>Paul Therence Senghor, Senegal
>Koffi Goti, Cote d'Ivoire
>Mokosa Madende, Congo Democ
>Jean Jacques Rakotonalala, Madagascar
>Juvent Baramburiye, Burundi
>Worku Damena, Ethiopia
>Gietaturn Mulat, Ethiopia
>M.S. Harbi, Sudan
>Eltahir Ibrahim Mohamed, Sudan
>Maria A. Calane da Silva, Mozambique
>Kohna Nganara Ngawara, Tchad
>Nkeoua Gregoire, Congo
>Mugorewera Drocella, Rwanda
>H. Yahia-Cafrif, Algeria
>Abebe Demissie, Ethiopia
>G.P. Mwila, Zambia
>Dr S.H. Raljtsogle, Lesotho
>Naceu Hamza, Tunisia
>Hambourne Mellas, Morocco
>Elizabeth Matos, Angola
>Tewolde Berhane Gebre Egziabher, Ethiopia
>
>Additional statement by Zimbabwean delegate:
>"Africa should not be used as a testing ground for technologies and products
>which have been developed elsewhere. We reserve our sovereign right to test
>these technologies ourselves, examine their effectiveness and compatibility
>to the environment in our region."
>(Document ends)

******************************
Harry Pollard
Henry George School of LA
Box 655
Tujunga  CA  91042
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: (818) 352-4141
Fax: (818) 353-2242
*******************************


Reply via email to