Ray,

As contract is central to a free society, personal liability is essential.

People are responsible for any harm they cause, and I agree with you, it 
should be world-wide.

A little less seriously. what a change would occur if politicians had to 
take out "Campaign Promise Insurance".

But, couldn't get it!

Harry

---------------------------------------------

Ray wrote:

>Bill,
>
>Good show.    I agree with you completely, but most capitalists claim that
>they would never get products out if that was the case and in the case of
>medical drugs they claim that many people would miss the benefits and die
>while the testing went on.    In the case of medicine I believe they already
>claim the positive result in spite shallow test results.  I suspect that we
>are just totally incapable of "down to the seventh generation" type of
>thinking in the West's current economic and philosophical systems.     I
>believe that a good liability system is the only answer to such things.
>And it should be world wide.    Of course getting rid of the liability
>system is what the current business and government leaders call "Tort
>Reform."     How's that for Newspeak?
>
>Ray Evans Harrell
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "William B Ward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:18 AM
>Subject: Re: No more slanging ( was Re: dumping GM food on Africa
>
>
> > Since most studies use and alpha value of <.05 to demonstrate statistical
> > significance [a few even use .01], the probability of finding a
> > significant effect is 1 out of 20. These cutoff points have been selected
> > by statisticians since statisticians are the accountants of the
> > scientific world. The cutoff points were totally arbitrary and have NO
> > scientific basis. They are meant to protect the status quo. It could take
> > years to show an impact. What we can say is that, unless it has been
> > missed, there is no overwhelming evidence that these GM products make a
> > tremendous impact in the short run. What studies should have to do is
> > show is that new products have a significantly positive impact  and that
> > there is a .95 chance of their not doing harm. This is just the opposite
> > of what the current process is.
> >
> > Bill Ward


******************************
Harry Pollard
Henry George School of LA
Box 655
Tujunga  CA  91042
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: (818) 352-4141
Fax: (818) 353-2242
*******************************


Reply via email to