Power refers to the situation of everyday life. I think the conversation is still theoretical, still theological.
arthur -----Original Message----- From: Selma Singer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 9:01 PM To: Tom Walker; Brad McCormick, Ed.D.; Ray Evans Harrell; Harry Pollard Cc: futurework Subject: Re: "Tom Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Selma Singer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Brad McCormick, Ed.D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Ray Evans Harrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I keep looking at some of these conversations and constantly get the feeling that I'm missing something. Have ai just missed the part where someone mentions the issue of power? It has to have entered the conversation at some point; I must have missed it. Selma ----- Original Message ----- From: "Harry Pollard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tom Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Selma Singer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Brad McCormick, Ed.D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Ray Evans Harrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "futurework" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 3:23 PM Subject: "Tom Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Selma Singer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Brad McCormick, Ed.D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Ray Evans Harrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Tom, > > Seems simple enough - let's try again: > > To place your paragraph in perspective. When a trade takes place, can we > not make a shrewd observation that both sides think they are better off - > or they wouldn't have traded? >
