Keith, I'm all for this.  There is a wealth of experience and knowledge
among senior citizens and the professional community that could greatly
enhance the classroom environment and reduce the strain on career
professional teachers and administrators.  It seems that the idea will only
be taken seriously when there is a desperate shortage or certification
crises, not an academic one.
Oregon has discussed bringing in '2nd career' teachers but the subject has
been dropped amid the chaos of the school funding crises, where we are less
worried about the upcoming teacher retirement flood than we are paying for
the rest of this school year.
However, there should be some sort of classroom certification, and serious
screening, so that we don't get people inbetween jobs dropping into the
classroom with no real commitment or continuity.
Something similar to the Teach America program could be utilized.  My
youngest daughter will graduate in May with her double BA in poly/sci -
sociology and has just been notified by Teach America that they liked her
interview and transcript.  IF she goes into the program, they will place her
somewhere in the US, give her a crash course in classroom techniques and
when she has taught for two years, reimburse her for her graduate degree.  A
private GI Bill for Teachers.  (She was smart enough to not stipulate just
K-6 or 7-12, while restricting her geographical preference to the N.
Virginia, Washington DC, Baltimore region where she has been in college.)
Programs like Teach America are not entirely accepted by venerable teachers
who have honed their craft over many years of classroom experience, battling
not just reluctant students but clueless and/or hostile parents.  If the
'new kids' are paid the same as those who went through teacher certification
it does raise resentment, especially if Teach America teachers are seen as
'temps' in the classroom who may or may not do the job well with all the
heart and soul it demands to be good.
PBS (Public Broadcast System) had a very insightful multipart program on
this very practice, showcasing 4 or 5 college graduates who took the crash
course, were placed in NYC schools with the cameras recording both their
good and bad moments, interviews and comments from their principals, etc.
Very good television work.  Of the showcased teachers, I believe only one
did not become a full time teacher.  So it does work as a recruitment tool.
Why can't seniors with experience valuable to the classroom be more than
guest lecturers?   Why should senior citizens be relegated to a supposedly
recreational-only status?  I don't want that for myself, and see that not
being socially active and/or intellectually challenged is accelerating aging
issues in my own parents, both in their early 70s.  I think baby boomers are
going to change things in this as they have so much else.  - Karen Watters
Cole

Keith wrote:  I've previously mentioned that the English state education
system is
breaking down. The state simply can't recruit enough young people of
sufficient calibre to train as teachers and of those who do, in fact,
finish teacher-training college, up to 30% refuse to actually start
teaching when they've experienced what goes on in schools during their
final student practice. (Of those who start teaching, more than one third
can't do elementary maths problems and almost the same proportion can't
write grammatically.) The chief reasons for this lamentable situation are
(a) highly centralised bureaucratic control; (b) protective practices by
teaching unions and teacher-training colleges; (c) a never-ending stream of
detailed instructions emanating from London which harrass teachers and cuts
into their teaching time.

Among many other symptoms, the state education system cannot recruit (never
mind retain!) anywhere near the number of teachers required for language,
science, engineering and maths. Yet there are scores of thousands of
linguists, engineers and scientists in the country who (like me) might well
like to spend a year or two of their retirement in teaching in
(particularly) secondary schools. Many of us would be prepared to do so
with little or even no reward. Hitherto, the unions and the government have
treated possible volunteers like us as lepers and have been implacably set
against any of these civic minded people getting anywhere near their state
schools

But another crack in the edifice is appearing. It was announced this
morning that primary schools are going to be able to recruit people to
teach languages who haven't actually received their teaching certificate!
Apparently, it doesn't matter any longer! And this decision from a
socialist government which has dared to challenge the unions! Wow! I still
can't quite believe it. I still can't quite believe that it will actually
happen.

In the case of language teaching, it's mainly a matter of pride. Here we
have prime minister Tony Blair desperately anxious to have more influence
in the European Union but whose state schools are turning out hundreds of
thousands of young people every year who have no language whatsoever
besides English.

However, we are still terribly short of maths teachers and this is not yet
denting Blair's amour propre. Many state secondary schools have no teachers
with a maths degree at all.
Outgoing Mail Scanned by NAV 2002


Reply via email to