Gosh, I hate to quibble with Moyers, but this may be more than a quibble: copyright protects not an idea but text.  Whatever I write is protected (except for fair use provisions), But the idea that I am writing about is not, per se, protected. Anyone can freely express the same idea, and as long as they do it with substantially different words (or text) there is no infringement.
 
Cheers,
Lawry
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Karen Watters Cole
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 4:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Futurework] copyrights (was Sonny Bono Pro Bono)

NOW with Bill Moyers had a segment on the ongoing battle regarding copyright/patent law/intellectual property that is worth your time.  At the following URL is a brief chronological table that is helpful. 

 

Introduction to Copyright in America:  “Copyright law protects the expression of an idea.  Almost any expression can be copyrighted, and copyright attaches as soon as the expression is fixed in some tangible form.  As our society has become more attached to information as the source of American jobs, there has been more emphasis on a rigid set of rules to govern intellectual property rights. 

 

Some cite book trade in Greece in the 5th century BCE as the first example of the concept of intellectual property, viewing it as the buying and selling of on information.  However, copyright law as we know it today has developed bit by bit starting in the 18th century, when the precursor of modern copyright, the Statute of Anne, was passed in England in 1710.  This act established author’s ownership of copyright under a fixed term.  The history of copyrights in the United States follows”: http://www.pbs.org/now/politics/copyright.html

If you are interested in this, the segment transcript, although not as fully provocative as when speaking bodies provide drama and nuance, was an excellent coverage of the questions to this debate:  Tollbooths on the Digital Highway @ http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/transcript_copyright.html

 

Can’t say that I’m a grad level student on the subject now, but certainly knew much more than I did yesterday. 

 

I thought the proposal to institute a “relicensing fee” on expiring original copyrights sounded reasonable.  

 

Karen

Reply via email to