This is really following a separate thread on the state of the state of Israel, but thought other FWers would be interested in these current observations:

My perspective is that all parties, the Israelis and Palestinians who live there, the offsite Jews and non-Jews, everyone has to admit that the old dance steps are not the answer.  Each side must look in the mirror and change.  This is Twelve Steps time.  The I-P solution is a petri dish for what all multiethnic, limited-resource nations face in a globalized modern world still carrying ancient tribal themes: to fail here is a symbolic failure for the rest of us. 

Personally, I don’t have much optimism that either Israel or a new Palestinian state has much viability as long as they are founded with official state religions.  The tribal traditions are so intense in this region, the land battles now embedded in the genes of another generation.  An eye-for-an-eye has led to a lot of blindness. 

Karen Watters Cole

 

Israel Waits for Godot By Thomas L. Friedman, NYT, 01.19.03 @ http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/19/opinion/19FRIE.html

TEL AVIV — Maybe the most telling fact in this coming Israeli election is that at this moment of intense crisis, a tiny Israeli party, Green Leaf, which advocates the legalization of marijuana, could win one or two seats in the new parliament. Green Leaf's motto might as well be: since every other solution has been tried and failed, why not just get high?

 

I've covered a lot of Israeli elections, but I have never seen one like this. I've never seen the Israeli public less interested in the two major parties — indeed, in the whole event. The reasons are not hard to discern. The last two years of suicide bombings and collapsed peace have knocked the stuffing out of this place.

 

It is not that Israelis are about to surrender.  The Palestinian fantasy that the Jews will just pick up and leave if you turn the heat up on them high enough was so wrong, so foolish. (You should see the number of concerts and theater and dance performances in Tel Aviv on any given evening.) Nevertheless, there is a deep and growing sense among Israelis of "No Exit," a sense that every idea has been tried — peace overtures, crackdowns, settlements, targeted killings, the left-wing solution and the right-wing solution, and nothing works.  As an Israeli friend told me over dinner: "You look at your kids and your grandkids now and you ask yourself: What if it never ends?"

 

Israeli Parties Clamor for Votes in Divided Society @ http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/19/international/middleeast/19ISRA.html

 

“…All of this, politicians and political scientists say, mirrors deep changes under way in Israel.  "More than ever before, the advertisements represent the structure of Israeli society," said Yoram Peri, chairman of the Chaim Herzog Center for Media, Politics and Society at Tel Aviv University. "We have a very divided society with a very strong emphasis on your identification with your tribe."

 

The Russian parties generally include Hebrew subtitles, though not always.  Two of the Orthodox parties also run Hebrew subtitles when their leaders speak, although both speak Hebrew.  The reason is that both are aged rabbis, and they mumble.  One of them, Ovadia Yosef of the party Shas, is shown telling congregants that when they are judged after death, an angel will reassure them: "Don't worry, relax — you went to the ballot box, and you put in a ballot for Shas. You go to heaven — go to the fifth floor."

 

On Thursday evening that commercial was immediately followed by one for a left-wing party, Meretz. That ad also showed a clip of Rabbi Yosef cursing the Meretz leader, Yossi Sarid. "May his name be erased," the rabbi declares.  In fierce competition with other secular parties, Meretz is bidding for anti- religious voters.

 

That Meretz message demonstrates the limited ambitions of these parties. "The real campaign is within a camp, not between camps," said Sam Lehman-Wilzig, the vice chairman of the department of political studies at Bar-Ilan University.  Each party is not trying to reach swing voters in the center as much as it is "going after the near circle of potential supporters who are seriously considering one or two other parties in the immediate vicinity."

(end of excerpts) 

Outgoing mail scanned by NAV 2002

Reply via email to