ZNet | Iraq

War For World Dominance

by Karen Talbot; February 05, 2003

George Bush's recent State of the Union speech should alarm the people
of our country and the entire planet about the perils facing us all-and
they are not the ones he spoke of with arrogance, lies, and threats. The
true significance of his words is yet to be fully comprehended by many
of us.

The real reasons for a war against Iraq
 Bush, and the ruling Wall Street elite he represents, are desperately
seeking to cope with a growing economic crisis attributable to
fundamental contradictions in the very system over which they reign. As
in the past, war is seen as the answer. Today, they want to go to war to
grab the vast untapped oil riches of Iraq and the Persian Gulf. More
importantly, they want to literally rule the world because they think it
will rescue them from the deepening economic morass and bring a
cornucopia of super profits. They are also massively shifting the burden
of the crisis to the workers, poor, and middle strata in the United
States and in every corner of the world. In the process they intend to
siphon off even more wealth to the minuscule top one percent of society.
Such were the undercurrents beneath Bush's State of the Union rhetoric.

There is no question, Bush and the oil interests he and his cohorts
represent, aim to seize the "black gold" reserves of Iraq, second only
to those of Saudi Arabia-easily extractible, easily refined, high
quality, and therefore highly profitable petroleum, the possession of
which would allow U.S. oil companies also to undermine OPEC and thus
control prices. They are driven by the fact that Iraq is strategically
located near other oil-rich nations of the Middle East, critical
waterways, and key pipeline routes from Central Asia. They are also
driven by the reality that the world's hydro-carbon reserves are being
depleted rapidly, yet the oil wells of Iraq will continue to produce
after most others run dry.

To take over these oil reserves, they need to occupy Iraq and stave off
companies from rival powers like France, Russia, and China, all of which
have been granted concessions by the Iraqi regime to develop a
considerable portion of those riches.

Equally important: they need to control the people of Iraq. After all,
from the time oil was discovered in their country, the mass of Iraqi
people waged bitter struggles for nationalization of their natural
resources against brutal imperialist domination by Britain and the
United States who were acting on behalf of the giant oil corporations.
This was also the experience of the Iranian people when the CIA deposed
their democratically-elected leader, Mohammad Mossadegh, in 1953,
because he nationalized Iran's oil. The same dynamics are being echoed
today in Venezuela.

Moreover, a war against Iraq will generate even greater profits for the
armaments industry. What better way to stuff their coffers than to build
weapons and then blow them up- perfect "built-in obsolescence." There
are built-in consumers, as well-the taxpaying public which has dished
out trillions of dollars to the Pentagon in recent years while basic
social programs have been undermined or eliminated. And now, more than
ever, there is the lucrative sale of U.S. weaponry to the new NATO
members from Eastern Europe who are being prevailed upon to update their
military and vastly increase their armaments budgets to the tremendous
detriment of their own social programs.

World dominance
These are key reasons for the current war frenzy. But there is something
qualitatively more dangerous underway. There is an overriding
long-planned agenda being orchestrated and directed by the Bush regime
for total world dominance-economically and militarily. Such dominance is
sought in order to wield full control over the governments and peoples
of the poorer nations, but also over the European Union, Japan, and the
other imperial rivals. Bloody wars have been waged in the past among
such competitors seeking control over global markets and resources. It
would be a mistake to assume we are beyond such confrontations today.

Attacking Iraq is the lynchpin in the scheme for world dominance. Bush,
Colin Powell, and others in the administration have said the assault
will begin within the next few weeks, no matter what the UN does. In
fact, it probably will work to Washington's advantage to act without the
UN as this will eliminate the necessity of making deals with France and
Russia for sharing the spoils in order to win their votes in the
Security Council. Nevertheless, it is possible that on the eve of an
actual attack, these nations will capitulate, perhaps even voting at the
last minute for a new enabling resolution in a desperate attempt to
latch onto at least some of the booty.

Leading up to this critical turning point, we have seen the alarming
growth in clout of the military-industrial complex, about which
President Eisenhower sounded a dire warning. We have seen the advent of
new military doctrines projecting "full spectrum dominance,"
"pre-emptive" nuclear strike, and the "war against terrorism." We have
heard the U.S. Space Command speak openly about "dominating space to
dominate Earth" in order to protect U.S. investments. We have witnessed
the moves to weaponize and nuclearize space and to build destabilizing
anti-ballistic missiles, while scrapping the ABM Treaty . We have seen
the rapid eastward expansion of NATO with the U.S. at the helm. We have
seen a significant increase in the huge number of globe-encircling U.S.
military bases. These new installations are strategically located near
oil fields and pipeline routes, particularly in Central Asia, Georgia,
Afghanistan, and the former Yugoslavia. We have seen the use in Iraq,
Yugoslavia, and Afghanistan, of ever-more powerful and illegal weapons,
including fuel-air explosives, cluster bombs, radioactive depleted
uranium- tipped armaments and "bunker busting" bombs, all of which have
killed thousands of civilians. Are these not weapons of mass
destruction?

"Shock and Awe"
All of that will pale by comparison with what's ahead. When Bush gives
the word, "the full force and might of the U.S. military" will be
unleashed in an unprovoked assault against a nation of 22 million people
who already have suffered immeasurably from brutal war and economic
sanctions-a country which ironically is the "cradle of civilization."

Even as Bush spoke before the joint session of Congress, the Pentagon
leaked reports that the U.S. will hit Iraq with up to 800 cruise
missiles in two days-more than twice the number of missiles launched
during the entire 40 days of the 1991 Gulf War. The intent is to shatter
Iraq "physically, emotionally and psychologically." The objective is to
"shock and awe."

The "Shock and Awe" scheme was concocted by military strategist Harlan
Ullman who said "you have this simultaneous effect-rather like the
nuclear weapons at Hiroshima-not taking days or weeks but minutes."* A
Pentagon official told CBS News following a briefing on the plan: "The
sheer size of this has never been seen before, never been contemplated
before."

A senior Bush official confirmed that "Shock and Awe" is the concept on
which the war plan is based," according to CBS News.

"Shock and Awe" is aimed at demonstrating what Armageddon would look
like. It is aimed at trying to terrify the people and nations of the
world-any who might dare challenge U.S. dominance or stand in the way of
conquest and plunder. Bush and his entourage have repeatedly stressed
that Iraq will be just the beginning of an unprecedented ongoing war.
Add this his threat to use nuclear weapons in a pre-emptive first
strike. Any country he labels part of the "axis of evil" is fair game.
Zbigniew Bzrezinski in his book, "The Grand Chessboard" dubs this as a
"new kind of hegemony," a "benevolent" imperialism.

Bush exhibits absolutely no glimmer of human concern for the tens of
thousands of Iraqi civilians who will die horrible deaths. Almost half
of the Iraqi people are under age 14, so a high percentage of civilian
deaths will be children. This is on top of the more than 500,000
children who have died from the sanctions according to UNICEF. And what
of the additional hundreds of thousands who will suffer injuries,
illness, hunger, and total disruption of their lives.

There's barely a murmur of concern for the likely casualties among U.S.
troops, or the probability that many of them, as with veterans of the
1991 Gulf War, will be stricken by "Gulf War Syndrome" caused by
radioactive depleted uranium and other toxins.

What of the United Nations?
Bush, Colin Powell, and other administration insiders have made it clear
the U.S. will carry out the assault on Iraq with or without the
authority of the United Nations. Joining Bush's war will be junior
partner Britain, dragged into the fray by Prime Minister Tony Blair, who
is totally disregarding the overwhelming opposition of the British
public. After-all, Britain is keen to restore at least some of its
previous imperialist status in the region.

They will carry out his war in defiance of the UN Charter and
international law, and with disdain for the pleas for peace of tens of
millions of people the world over. This includes the protest of what has
certainly become a wide-ranging majority of people in the U.S. They will
proceed with the assault without "smoking gun" evidence, merely
resorting to presenting more circumstantial "proof" before the Security
Council as the hour of the attack nears. But then, Washington really
feels it doesn't need to convince the UN because they have decided to
wage war no matter what happens.

There is a growing worldwide demand that there should be no
legitimization of this war through capitulation of UN Security Council
members to bribes and threats. Such a development would not only violate
every tenet of international law but it would it would undermine the
United Nations itself.

Despite Bush administration's obvious disdain for the rest of the world,
the economic turmoil spreading in the U.S. ironically has been partially
staved off by a massive inflow of capital from Europe, Asia, Middle East
oiligarchies and elsewhere, which has furthered the extravagant
accumulation of wealth by the super-rich. Borrowing from abroad has
amounted to $2 billion a day. But the abrupt decline of the dollar in
recent weeks threatens to undermine confidence which could interrupt
that massive influx of capital and lead to a dramatic further decline in
the economy. Meanwhile, joblessness grows, the stock market keeps
diving, the Federal government is piling up a huge deficit, budget
deficits of state and local governments are unprecedented in scope, and
there are record corporate losses including the recent nearly 100
billion record loss by AOL.

Not only are Bush and his Wall Street backers motivated by the notion
that war and world imperial hegemony will solve such daunting systemic
economic troubles. They also want to divert the attention of the people
from the social and economic daily problems they face at home.

In today's world, bristling with arsenals of nuclear weapons, resort to
war must end once and for all. Fundamental societal changes are required
in order create the conditions for redirecting the trillions of dollars
flushed down the drain of military spending to feed the hungry, create
jobs, provide quality housing, healthcare and education, in the U.S. and
worldwide. This is also the way to end terrorism. Only massive
democratic actions by the people can stop the drive to war and
ultimately accomplish these other essential changes. Therefore, it is
more vital than ever in history to turn out in our tens millions for the
upcoming worldwide anti-war demonstrations on February 15 and 16. These
challenges can and must be met for the sake of humankind's very
survival.

-------------
*Ullman's book "Shock and Awe: Achieving Rapid Dominance," is posted on
the site of the Command and Control Research Program (CCRP) of the U.S.
Department of Defense.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------


Distributed by the International Center for Peace and Justice

Karen Talbot can be contacted at: International Center for Peace and
Justice [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to