More good stuff from the NYT.

Ed Weick
 
The New York Times

March 9, 2003

Pop Went the Bubble

5,048.62. That beguilingly pedestrian figure — most numbers are, once untethered from their context — marked the point at which one of history's most spectacular financial bubbles popped. Three years ago tomorrow, it was the closing number for the Nasdaq composite, the market index for all those "new economy" tech stocks.

It proved to be the high for an index that came to reflect far more than the actual value of Americans' ownership in a set of companies. Stock markets, after all, chart society's mood as much as anything — which helps explain why the Dow Jones industrial average was only a single point higher at the end of 1981 than it was at the end of 1964.

March 10, 2000, does not seem like a long time ago solely because the Nasdaq is now at 1,305.29. Americans at the turn of the millennium, before the botched presidential election, the collapse of Enron and the Sept. 11 attacks, viewed theirs as a moment of extravagant opportunity. So many of the old constraints — from the cold war's sense of peril to the business cycle — seemed a thing of the past. On that day, a Friday, our colleague Thomas L. Friedman complained in his column that foreign policy was not an issue in the presidential campaign, "due in part to the relative peace and prosperity America now enjoys." At neighborhood barbershops, people were talking stocks. The feverish deal of the week three years ago was VeriSign's acquisition of Network Solutions. Most people were fuzzy on exactly what these Internet companies did, but whatever it was, it was worth some $20 billion.

Americans no longer expect to see the Nasdaq at 5,000 again anytime soon, if ever. Not that the market's rebound is our main concern. Americans these days feel as if they've lost far more than a few trillions in the stock market. We mourn the passing of that moment of extravagant opportunity.


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy

Reply via email to