Request for
Comments
A Fiscal Train
Wreck
By Paul Krugman, NYT,
031103
With
war looming, it's time to be prepared. So last week I switched to a
fixed-rate mortgage. It means higher monthly payments, but I'm terrified
about what will happen to interest rates once financial markets wake up to
the implications of skyrocketing budget deficits.
From
a fiscal point of view the
impending war is a lose-lose proposition.
If it goes badly,
the resulting mess will be a disaster for the budget. If it goes well,
administration officials have made it clear that they will use any bump in
the polls to ram through more big tax cuts, which will also be a disaster
for the budget. Either way, the
tide of red ink will keep on rising.
Last
week the Congressional Budget Office marked down its estimates yet again.
Just two years ago, you may
remember, the C.B.O. was projecting a 10-year surplus of $5.6 trillion. Now
it projects a 10-year deficit of $1.8 trillion.
And
that's way too optimistic. The
Congressional Budget Office operates under ground rules that force it to
wear rose-colored lenses.
If you take into account — as the C.B.O. cannot — the effects of likely
changes in the alternative minimum tax, include realistic estimates of
future spending and allow for the cost of war and reconstruction, it's clear
that the 10-year deficit will be at least $3
trillion.
So
what? Two years ago the
administration promised to run large surpluses. A year ago it said the
deficit was only temporary. Now
it says deficits don't matter.
But we're looking at a fiscal crisis that will drive interest rates
sky-high.
A
leading economist
recently summed up one reason why: "When the government reduces saving by
running a budget deficit, the interest rate rises." Yes, that's from a textbook by the
chief administration economist, Gregory Mankiw. But what's really scary — what makes
a fixed-rate mortgage seem like such a good idea — is the looming threat to
the federal government's solvency.
That
may sound alarmist: right now the deficit, while huge in absolute terms, is
only 2 — make that 3, O.K., maybe 4 — percent of G.D.P. But that misses
the point. "Think of the federal government as
a gigantic insurance company (with a sideline business in national defense
and homeland security), which does its accounting on a cash basis, only
counting premiums and payouts as they go in and out the door. An insurance company with cash
accounting is an accident waiting to happen." So
says
the Treasury under secretary Peter Fisher; his
point is that because of the future liabilities of Social Security and
Medicare, the true budget picture is much worse than the conventional
deficit numbers suggest.
Of
course, Mr. Fisher isn't allowed to draw the obvious implication: that his
boss's push for big permanent tax cuts is completely crazy. But the conclusion is
inescapable.
Without
the Bush tax cuts,
it would have been difficult to cope with the fiscal implications of an
aging population.
With
those tax cuts,
the task is simply impossible.
The
accident — the fiscal train wreck — is already under way.
How
will the train wreck play itself out?
Maybe a future administration will use butterfly ballots to
disenfranchise retirees, making it possible to slash Social Security and
Medicare. Or maybe a repentant
Rush Limbaugh will lead the drive to raise taxes on the rich. But my prediction is that
politicians will eventually be tempted to resolve the crisis the way
irresponsible governments usually do: by printing money, both to pay current
bills and to inflate away debt.
And
as that temptation becomes obvious, interest rates will soar. It won't happen right away. With the economy stalling and the
stock market plunging, short-term rates are probably headed down, not up, in
the next few months, and mortgage rates may not have hit bottom yet. But
unless we slide
into Japanese-style deflation, there are much higher interest rates in our
future.
I
think that the main thing keeping long-term interest rates low right now is
cognitive
dissonance. Even though the business community
is starting to get scared — the ultra-establishment
Committee for Economic Development
now warns that "a
fiscal crisis threatens our future standard of living"
— investors
still can't believe that the leaders of the United States are acting like
the rulers of a banana republic. But I've done the math, and reached
my own conclusions — and I've locked in my rate.
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/11/opinion/11KRUG.html
Outgoing mail scanned by NAV
2002
