"Brad McCormick, Ed.D." wrote:
> *However*, long before Bernard Lewis asked "What went wrong?"
> anent Islam, Joseph Needham spent a long lifetime asking: "What
> went wrong?" (OK -- more accurately: "What failed to get
> started?") in China.
> 
> Needham's conclusion, which he did not like, was that Europe
> "took off" into modernity whereas China stagnated because Europe
> had capitalism and China didn't.
> ... 
> Why didn't China "take off"?  (Maybe they had too
> much leisure?)

Brad - I don't think this quite gets Needham right. His
question took more the form: given that ancient and medieval
Chinese technology and its implementations are vastly
superior to those of the west, why was there an industrial
revolution in the west and not in the east (& correlatively,
the modern techno-science that was part of the process). 

To say that Europe had capitalism and China didn't would be
too close to a tautology for Needham. As I read his answer -
especially in an essay "Science and Society: East and West"
(1964) - the essential matter is intense & repeated social
breakdown in Europe - which has many causes, the formations
of early capitalism among them - whereas Chinese history is
characterized by long periods of social stability only
rarely punctuated by upheaval and social change. Social
dislocations in Europe allow for the emergence of new
activities. new social roles, the scientist-engineer
(pioneered in some ways by the artist-architect-engineers of
the Renaissance) and the capitalist-entrepreneur among them,
and consequently the social activities of modern science,
the premium placed on innovation, etc.  

So, interesingly, "too much leisure" in a sense is right. If
everything is ticking right along and society is not
breaking down all around you, one can proceed in a leisurely
way. Stability. Tradition. No crises. 

sound right? 

Stephen Straker 

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   
Vancouver, B.C.



_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to