Some FWers are deeply concerned about the in-fighting (and killings) that hass already taked place between different Shia Muslim schisms in Iraq now that the pressure has been lifted from them. Hassan Grebawy, mentioned below seems a strong contender for national leadership of the Shias. After then, will he turn on the Sunnis?  After then, will he turn on the lower- and middle-ranking Baathists (the only people who are competent to run the country)?

After then, what? An Iranian-type theocracy which, at present, is turning down every reform which the Iranian Parliament is trying bring about?

Keith Hudson
  
<<<<
IRAQI RELIGIOUS GROUP TURNS TO TV AND RADIO

By Charles Clover in Baghdad


A powerful Shi'a political group in Iraq plans shortly to begin its own radio and television broadcasts from Baghdad, a key step towards promoting its influence in the country.

Hassan Grebawy, head of the Centre for Public Islam, said he had received both oral and written permission from US forces to start the broadcasts, which will be financed by the Hawza, a loose grouping of Shi'a religious schools in the southern city of Najaf.

Mr Grebawy's centre, set up under the patronage of Shi'a cleric Moktada al-Sadr, will broadcast from the al-Hikmah mosque in the Shi'a suburb of Baghdad. He said the range of the broadcasts would be 50km, enough to encompass Baghdad, and plans are under way to extend the broadcasts to the rest of the country, where the Shi'a form a 55 per cent majority.

The television and radio stations should serve as powerful tools for consolidating Mr Sadr's influence. Already, an overwhelming majority of Shi'a in Baghdad profess allegiance to him.

He is not known for his tolerance of US forces in Iraq, though he is rarely heard from publicly. His followers have frequently organised mass demonstrations in Baghdad calling for an end to US occupation.

Mr Grebawy made it clear that the broadcasts, to be named "Baghdad reports" and introduced with the calligraphic symbol of Iraqi state television, will not be friendly towards the US presence: "If I come to your house riding on a tank, and take over your oil, and take over your money, and tell you that you need my permission to do anything, then is this justice?", he asks.

Coalition forces have been tolerant in allowing Iraqis to express dissenting views, considering it a useful exercise in democracy building. Numerous newspapers have been set up in Baghdad, many critical of the coalition presence.

"The Americans said they have no objection in principle to these broadcasts," said Mr Grebawy.

He showed a letter from the US 1st Brigade, charged with security in Baghdad, giving permission for a radio station. "The 1st Brigade Combat Team would like to thank Sayid Ali [a member of Mr Sadr's group] for his support of US forces in the liberation of Iraq," said the letter. Mr Grebawy said they had received verbal permission for the television station, and a letter would follow. The 1st Brigade could not be reached for comment.

US forces have relied heavily on Shi'a religious leaders to help them restore basic services such as garbage removal and medical facilities in their neighbourhoods, and the letter seemed to be partly a quid pro quo for this help.

But ultimately, giving Shi'a Islamist groups access to their own television station could undermine the US goal of keeping Iraq a secular state.

Asked what political message they would be broadcasting on their TV channel, Mr Grebawy said: "The political content of the broadcasts will be that religion is politics and politics is religion. We are only expressing the reality of the Iraqi street.

"We need television broadcasts which will express the views of all Iraqis, about their problems, including the American occupation."
>>>>
Financial Times; May 28, 2003

Keith Hudson, 6 Upper Camden Place, Bath, England

Reply via email to