So is all of this talk a problem with the welfare state or is it just human cycles that exist in every system?   I don't see all of these mags., like the Economist, complaining about capitalism because the artists are forced to follow the "starving artist" model.    No one says that its a problem for capitalism that sculptors have to mortgage their cars, if they can afford one, just to get material for the next sculpture and for computer artists, its "mortgages their lives", given the expense of these monsters.  In Socialist society it is much easier for an artist to do their work and eat while here if you eat, most artists, even some of the very best like all of our major composers and poets,  have to give up your work.   
 
The Starving Artist myth for creativity is nothing but a sop for capitalists not to take the heat for NOT stimulating creativity and  innovation.   The supply and demand model is so inadequate that my General Manager attended an artistic conference in Portland and most of the people that she approached had no idea who America's greatest living composer was.   The man who has written more and won more prizes, been performed more and made more money, but not enough to live one, brought more cultural fame to America and was President of the highest scholars society, The American Society of Arts and Letters, wasn't even known.   The only living composer they knew was Philip Glass who is the sole serious composer commercial success in America.   If you took a modern music history book, Glass is the only live composer that any of you would have the vaguest recognition of.   The same was true of this general conference of Americans for the Arts.    You can say what you will about Scandinavian composers but at least the Scandinavians know them and even the old Soviet Union performed and created massive amounts of music that these Russian musicians,  who are now starving like the rest of the Capitalist world, knew and loved.   Americans have no knowledge or control over their whole aural aesthetic landscape.   It is a vast sprawl worse than any architectural urban sprawl and is only tolerable because it ceases once you turn off the media.    Successful Americans are either Cuckoos, kicking everyone else's children out while they put the parental resources of the world to supporting their own kids (wealthy) or they are Mockingbirds singing everyone else's songs and neither valuing and in most cases not having their own songs to sing.   The whole vast history of America is one evolution from Cuckoos to Mockingbirds with not an original in the bunch.
 
Doctors are finding the same economic issues with becoming privately liable.  And yet you guys just keep arguing retail.   Given even the cheapest cost issues on a human life, without some form of protective subsidy it simply isn't cost effective to take the risk and save lives.    Teachers long ago were reduced to teaching for altruism in a market economy.    About the only thing that you can truly guarantee follows supply and demand are retail objects or Gold.   There are so many crucial human endeavors that don't fit the market model its a wonder that we don't get it and come up with some other plan.   How about legal fees?    Giuliani took such advantage of the system that he prosecuted the small fry enemies in court which he always lost but the city paid for the prosecutions and his enemies went away broke.    That's a working political Democracy?     I didn't see Clinton using the powers of the Federal government against his prosecutors in a similar fashion.   Giuliani left his family and his son and persecuted his wife for this family loving party and yet he is still beloved.   Clinton had a concubine as allowed in the Jewish bible and he was reviled for playing polite political games of "deniability".    After the special prosecutors went after Nixon and Reagan, nothing got done because they were so frozen.   Clinton is blamed for not doing enough even though he was harassed for all eight years with this stuff.   If he had been a Republican he would have constantly hauled them into court and sued Mellon Scaife and the Fox News Channel.   Today we have a solidly Republican media and that is because the Democrats are such wusses and the only ones that seem to believe in democracy at all.   Democracies, like open societies are subject to fascism through terrorism and the Republicans have been practicing political terrorism since Hoover screwed everything up and they were disgraced.  
 
Democracy doesn't work without a committed, informed and educated citizenry.  That is in conflict with the baser principles of capitalism.   It is only because we have such commitment to the sins of our fathers and the culture it engendered that we are so unimaginative as to not even question our way out of this bipolar model that simply reinforces failure on every level but for the few and in material technology.   Also they lie, but that's another post, or maybe you could reread Natalia's analysis for my  Festival.   People can "take her on" for her science but if Derryl and she were as nasty to you about your knowledge of the aesthetics and the art's business, as the list was to her about her science then you would leave in a huff.   If you want to know what artists think of all this watch the second funny movie about the therapist and mobster "Analyze That" and look at the movie people.   The director and the actor playing the mob while the real mob is swirling around them.   The "step un' fetch it" character of the director and the actor who gets beaten up just to get some reality in his lines and thanks the man who beats him.    Those are the societal metaphors that my profession has had to accept to live in this hell.   
 
 
Artists are often taken to task for their connection to the non-visual non-corporeal  subtler energies.   Without those energies a trapeze artist would fall and the ballet would have never existed.   Theater and music plays in those fields and is so difficult that lives are always precarious at best.   Those of us who live constantly with the spirits are not as fascinated as those who only occasionally wake up to their existence.   
 
When someone wakes up or moves into a busy area filled with "psychic energy"   (Freud's term) like areas where I've been around Vancouver Island for example, the more sensitive are "touched."   But most people can walk through the Anthropology museum in Vancouver and feel nothing but a vague sense of wonder.   What I saw was art ripped from its context, objects and clothing of people who had died violently sacrificed to the quest for material comfort by the "wounded" of Europe and Asia who were driven from their homes because their own relatives had no use for them.   Today, both Asia and Europe is a different place after those wars and they seem to have discovered their souls.   Eventually, you learn to accept the muse, the spirits or whatever you want to call it and just live with them.   Like the French impressionists.    By and large the subtler energies are not communicative but you can mess with them and that is not such a good thing for your soul.
 
Every word that I write and you read is taken in the screen of your own experience and prejudices.   You and I use these scratches to open our own reality within ourselves.    We use each other to grow from within.   We must be careful not to abuse the materials but we must also know the quality and history of the materials we use lest we be foolish and destructive of other peoples.   
 
When I am rough with some of you it is an act of respect and long term acquaintance.   We have a history to bounce our current life off of.   You can be rough back.    Passion is rough.   But I remember a car that I had just had a new "ring job" done.    No one told me that new "rings" weren't durable and needed to "seat" with the rest of the motor.   So I promptly drove them too hard and ruined the job.   We sent the best football talent that we had ever seen to Oklahoma University with the famous Bud Wilkinson coach and Wilkinson put this upstart into a scrimmage with the top college football team in America and in the first play they blew out his knee.   Even the best coach in the country can be stupid sometimes.  He lost a great player but Larry Carnes lost his career.   Who paid?   Larry did.   I paid to have the rings redone.   Liability is the only way to enforce responsibility.   Liability is at odds with the capitalist system.   That Nuclear power that Harry likes has a 300 million dollar cap on liability for accidents.   Without that cap there would be no Nuclear industry.   The private sector would never finance such a thing with such a liability.   The same was true of starting the internet and of chip-fab laboratories.   Without privilege bestowed by the government on science through those laboratories we would have no micro-processors.   Private retail is good at harvesting but lousy at development of anything truly complex.  Do you truly trust the drug companies to cure the world's health ills or do you trust the drug companies plus the Federal government's support, back up and protection in developing those products?  
 
Winner take all game strategy is a stupid strategy for finding your way out of a cave that is slowly filling with water.    DeLay, the Republicans, the economists who are in control at the moment, the market and fundamentalist Christians all seem locked in a strategy that will not make it easier for us to do our work but impossible.    The fight is going on everywhere and even on this list.    Retail is ordinary, banal and uncreative.   It is lazy and unwilling to move without being threatened.   It is stupid in that it assumes that the rest of the world is just like them.  Only when it sacrifices the lives of the "losers" in their game do they feel strong and it takes the "losers" fighting back, for them to become creative.    Theoretical science is no more "productive" in the retail economic sense than classical composers.    You need look no further than retail to explain Granada, Panama and Iraq.  To claim that this government believed what the rest of us knew was nuts is to give them credit for being insane.   They aren't.   They are just retail, banal, provincial and in the tradition of poor sportsmanship that has permeated this culture from the outset.   After all, fair play, level fields and sportsmanship have nothing to do with retail.   That's why Henry George has a certain amount of resonance for me but frankly, I don't trust him.    At his roots, he's just as retail minded as the next Willy Loman.   One can love the practicality of the common man but one should also not confuse him with Einstein, Beethoven or Chekov.   To see the world, you have to be willing to climb and that isn't "productive" or "cost effective" and there's little demand for it.
 
Ray Evans Harrell       
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 7:46 AM
Subject: [Futurework] A Volvo without tyres

Hi Tor,

Further to our recent discussion as to whether Sweden can afford its high spending on welfare or not I quote some paragraphs from a recent Economist report. (Incidentally, about your own country, the report says that many Norwegians thinks that oil-bloated success could smother other parts of the economy, making you lazy, unenterprising and decreasingly able to generate new value. I'm sure this doesn't apply to you, but this is what the Economist thinks of some of your countrymen!)

Keith Hudson

<<<<
Meanwhile Sweden, the region's biggest economy, has gradually been slipping behind its Nordic neighbours in terms of income per person. "Sweden has become the poorest in the neighbourhood. Iceland, Norway, Finland and Denmark are richer and on a better trajectory," says Magnus Henrekson of the Stockholm School of Economics. Ericsson, the country's biggest telecoms-equipment company, is having a rough time. It is shedding 60,000 jobs over three years, and in April reported its eighth consecutive quarterly loss.

The city of Stockholm boomed briefly at the end of the 1990s, mostly because of big investments in technology companies and heavy spending on research and development, but the shine is wearing off here too. Swedes worry about the lack of new big companies. Small service firms do well, but Stefan Folster of the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise points out that every one of Sweden's 50 largest companies was formed before 1970.

In the early 1990s Sweden's public sector became too dominant even for Nordic tastes, with public spending in 1993 reaching 67.5% of GDP and the economy shrinking by 5.2% between 1990 and 1993. Carl Bildt's Conservative government introduced reforms to cut public spending which were carried further by its Social Democrat successor. Since then, says Mr Pagrotsky, the industry minister, "We've had fairly good development for ten years, though we have not been fantastic."

But now he is worried about adverse demographic factors. All the Nordic countries face an acute problem with ageing populations, and Sweden also suffers a higher rate of sick leave and absenteeism than other European countries. Mr Folster says these problems are so widespread (especially in the public sector and among women) that the proportion of people actually working is now the same as in 1995, when Sweden was in recession. Already the Finns are joking that: "The Swedish welfare state is like a Volvo without tyres: it is a great car, but it doesn't work."
>>>>


Keith Hudson, 6 Upper Camden Place, Bath, England

Reply via email to