Lawrence de Bivort wrote:
Greetings, all,
Let us remember that Bush's 'lie' is far greater than the matter of Niger uranium. The /whole /of the administration's rationale for invading Iraq was a lie, from the beginning. The uranium materials issue is trivial compared to the rest of their deception. I note that defenders of the President are still asserting that the invasion was 'morally' sound: in fact it was an egregious and clear breach of the basic tenets of international law.
[snip]

Yes, Bush has been lying a lot, probably.

But let us give him credit for having let the
truth slip out (probably more than once, but
I have only one citation reference):

    The reason America had to go to war against
    Sadam Hussein, and why this is *not* a parisan
    issue is that Sadam "once tried to kill
    my dad."

Don't say he didn't tell us the truth, at least one time.

Don't YOU want to die to help avenge the blood
grudge Bush2 has against Saddam because of
what Sasdam tried to do to Bush1?  Dulce et decorum
est, my fellow Americans!

\brad mccormick

--
  Let your light so shine before men,
              that they may see your good works.... (Matt 5:16)

Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. (1 Thes 5:21)

<![%THINK;[SGML+APL]]> Brad McCormick, Ed.D. / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------------
  Visit my website ==> http://www.users.cloud9.net/~bradmcc/

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to