I may have originally got this one from the list (possible Brad) but it is
appropriate...

"A man has made at least a start on discovering the meaning of human life
when he plants shade trees under which he knows full well he will never
sit."  D. Elton Trueblood

arthur

-----Original Message-----
From: Ray Evans Harrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 11:48 AM
To: Keith Hudson
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Hitherto, a Ricardian free trader


I would argue that a decline in the human spirit must precede one in
intellect and that an obvious misuse of fiscal materials must be the also
obvious result.    It has taken 300 years to destroy the cultural and
intellectual traditions that were 2000 years in the making in the West.

Such rationalizations, as most economists have put forth, including the
rationalization for war currently in vogue in the White House, are in my
opinion a cancer on the large system of the environment and the earth's
cultures.  Psycho-economic rationalizations have operated to their advantage
and to the ultimate disadvantage of cultural, intellectual and now public
health issues.   Soon, as you point out,  it will follow that the
environment will collapse as a result, but you still stubbornly refuse to
give up the rationalization.    People have to know to care about such
things as intelligence, education and public welfare and it is the cultural
systems that develop the ways of knowing in the growing individual.

Adopted children may have an inclination to their genetics but given the
proper cultural development of their perceptual abilities they have every
possibility of making informed and intelligent long range decisions.   I
contend that it follows that societies that do not do so are somehow
mistaken or lack good perceptual judgment.    Given the collapse you
describe that should be obvious.

Arthur has made the cogent point that today's corporate intelligencia are
either "sociopathic at least and psycho-pathological at worst" in their life
and business styles.   These are not the choices of informed, cogent,
developed human beings.   They may be good at hard science, physics and math
but their ability to project a clear future that includes us all is lacking.
So it would follow that hard science, physics and math must not be enough
and neither is economics.    Unless you begin with the mega-system and
project a future for it that includes all of the endeavors that make us
human then, I contend, that what you get is insanity in the real meaning of
the word or on the physical level, cancerous to the world system.

I also contend that such thought is just another form of fundamentalism that
reacts to its own literal rule's value in the face of the Mega-System.
Rather than confronting the mystery and exploring it, they react with such
word descriptions  as "chaos" and hide in their Platonic caves content with
examining shadows.     That is my judgment based upon my encounter with the
economic theories on this list that suffers from a proliferation of
descriptions but a dearth of ideas.    I make that judgment sadly for I
relate to their human condition and enjoy their personalities, however, I
live on the edge of that Great Mystery and struggle with it daily.   I give
no better than I ask.   To do less, weakens the intellectual integrity of
the list and is an exercise in impotence and at my age I have too little of
that left to squander it.

Just read Ed Weick's post so, maybe we are not so lacking in imagination
after all.   The problem still, however, is the inability of the sciences to
respond to "inner life" and motivation rather than "external motivation".
As opposed to externalities.    Economics seems locked in its own inner life
to the death of the external world while denying an inner life to the
development of the individual which begins in the realm of aesthetics.
Science's lock into the need for predictability denies human judgment and
makes automatons of us all.   Aesthetics gives you the tools and then sets
you free to become truly human.   It doesn't promise guarantees as science
desires but offers opportunities.   It is the basis of the "Pursuit of
Happiness" section of the Preamble to the American Constitution but
technology and modern science have precluded that as a possibility by
through their own fundamentalisms.    Got to go.

Ray Evans Harrell

P.S. My Maestro's son Matthew Ferro was one of the developers of the first
Matrix movie.    He did a lot of the technology and concepts.    His father
Daniel Ferro is one of America's great cultural treasures and has taught
more great singers than anyone living on the planet today.





----- Original Message -----
From: "Keith Hudson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ray Evans Harrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 3:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Hitherto, a Ricardian free trader


> Ray,
>
> At 20:53 03/08/2003 -0400, you wrote:
> >I have argued from my beginnings on this list that the psycho/economic
roots
> >of industrialism and what that means as work, in the Western sense,  was
> >incomplete, bordered on failure and demanded a serious look by serious
> >minds.   It seems you now have begun to question the logic that you have
> >espoused in the past.   I congratulate you on that and encourage the
> >continued exploration of such with your considerable intellect.    As
such I
> >hold great optimism that we will have some very good posts from Bath in
the
> >future.
>
> I'm not questioning the logic that I have espoused previously. All I am
> saying is that the free trade question has become relatively trivial
> compared with the serious decline of fossil fuels which will shortly be
> upon us -- with no obvious replacement energy technology in sight at
> present. Free trade or not, South America, Africa, Central Europe and the
> Middle East will not be able to join the developed world's economic
network
> because there isn't the energy to sustain them as well as us. America,
> China and western Europe's industrial system might well fail but not
before
> all the other blocs have failed first.
>
> KH
> Keith Hudson, 6 Upper Camden Place, Bath, England
>
> _______________________________________________
> Futurework mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
>

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to