Keith,

Sign me off of your list too. You simply do not have the guts to take the
heat.

Bill

On Sat, 06 Sep 2003 07:41:34 +0100 Keith Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
> Ray,
> 
> This is my last contribution to FW until you learn not to sound off 
> with 
> empty rhetoric and constant patronisation. You are always 
> overwhelmed with 
> the last book you have read -- which is almost always about your own 
> 
> ancestors. You are right to be proud about them, but they are only a 
> very 
> small part of the world and its past civilisations. What you have 
> written 
> below is very interesting but nothing whatever to do with the point 
> I was 
> making -- that trade leads to openness to new ideas.
> 
> I was stupid to start writing to FW again, because I like discussing 
> things 
> in a balanced way with rational people -- of which FW has a sizeable 
> number 
> with whom I feel privileged to exchange ideas. There is no 
> possibility of 
> doing so in your case. You are a prima donna, which is fine for 
> singing but 
> not for sensible discussion about the matters concerned in this 
> list.
> 
> KSH
> 
> At 18:52 05/09/2003 -0400, you wrote:
> >You say potaytoe and I say potahtoe.   You say tomaytoe and I say 
> Tomahtoe.
> >Lets call the whole thing off.
> >
> >Sorry I don't have time to do this more than cursorily but there is 
> a good
> >book that I've been reading that begins to take over the 
> intellectual
> >territory that has been claimed unjustly.   Its called "American 
> Indian
> >Contributions to the World, 15,000 years of Inventions and 
> Innovations."
> >Its by a couple of wild Lakota scholars who have scoured the 
> literature by
> >the name of Emory Dean Keoke and Kay Marie Porterfield.    
> Checkmark books.
> >Amongst other things it has several pages of comparisons between 
> the
> >Iroquois "Great Law"  and the American Constitution and 
> descriptions of
> >native roots of 19th century European political theories borrowed 
> from us.
> >Perhaps this cultural ill fit may have something to do with why 
> they don't
> >work there, if your observations are correct.   I can't tolerate 
> wheat
> >glutin or lactose either and the doctors tell me the roots are in 
> my blood.
> >Could be that cultural institutions don't travel as easily as 
> ideas.
> >
> >Keoke and Porterfield have an Encyclopedic discussion of such 
> things as
> >Trade,  Asphalt, Asepsis,  and all of the games that we now do 
> including
> >football, basketball, women's football (remarkably like soccer 
> which all of
> >the old worlds banned women from playing until recently).    
> Indians
> >invented the hollow rubber balls and brought rubber to the world.   
>  They
> >had universal gender equality and much of current psycho-analytic 
> work has
> >its roots in Native American dream techniques and free association. 
>   The
> >Gestalt psychologists studied with native practitioners in the 
> 1950s and
> >incorporated much of the group techniques into T groups and therapy 
> groups
> >that have found there way into modern business management as well.  
>  And
> >then there was the syringe used for such things as enemas and it 
> almost
> >seems like we  must have invented bathing since there was so little 
> of it
> >done in Europe until quite recently.  (joke)  While the Europeans 
> didn't
> >bother to boil the water to bathe wounds until the last couple of 
> centuries
> >pre-Columbians were bathing wounds with sterile water and using 
> Balsam as an
> >antiseptic  I realize Guy de Chauliac proposed such aseptic 
> practices in
> >1300 but the Europeans couldn't see the sense of it until Joseph 
> Lister
> >"proved" it by writing it down.  (not a joke)
> >
> >There were co-inventions of various other devices used by the 
> Sumerians
> >about the same time such as the use for certain petroleum products. 
>   Its an
> >amazing book.   Trade?   We had it from Tierra del Fuego to the 
> Arctic but
> >no draft animals so there was no reason to tear up the ground with 
> wheels.
> >And the lists of foods that we traded?    75% of the staple food 
> stuffs, all
> >listed, freeze dried and moved over great distances as well as the 
> most
> >productive food plant in the world, the sweet potato.
> >
> >Freedom? its built into the religion from the base up as a part of 
> empathy
> >for the various ceremonials of reconciliation.    Trade followed.
> >
> >  What did those European folks trade over the silk road?    We 
> traded long
> >fiber cotton and all kinds of exotic paints, rubber products,  
> flint tools,
> >medicines, cocoa and other foods like corn, beans squash, peanuts 
> etc.   Our
> >medicines are a cornucopia including primitive surgeries that 
> worked like
> >"drains" for sutured wounds, etc.
> >
> >The problem has always been the kind of "ignorance of the other 
> cultures"
> >that America has shown in Iraq.    American Europeans seem to 
> assume if they
> >don't know about it then it doesn't exist, or if a European can 
> take a
> >vacation there and spend a few weeks then, like the 
> anthropologists, they
> >become authorities.   Well, I've spent many years doing European 
> art and
> >culture and I know ours as well.   You can't do it in a week, a 
> month or a
> >year.    Like Bel Canto voice writings, if you "know" then books 
> can be
> >useful but if you don't know then they are not enough to "know" 
> what the
> >other side is doing.   Like trying to learn how to sing from a 
> book.   Not
> >possible.   You need holistic images to imitate.   Culture and the 
> roots of
> >conflicts are the same.   You have to experience it if you are to 
> know.
> >There are problems, (as I have said endlessly), with writing and 
> with book
> >learned history.
> >
> >Today we are beginning to fill in the holes on our own as we get 
> the money
> >to resist the power play from the dominant society.   All of this 
> as a
> >result of having casino wealth.   Wealth is not freedom in that 
> sense but
> >power and that gives us the power to resist the educational and 
> economic
> >slavery of those who would keep us enslaved.    The Pequot's have 
> built a
> >world class museum next to their casino for the education of the 
> children.
> >
> >  The internet is amazing and native scholars are beginning once 
> more to
> >claim our heritage that was taken and claimed as "inventions" for
> >Imperialists.   Sort of like making European names the only 
> official names
> >for the mountains of the world.   We're taking that back too.   
> Maybe that
> >tendency to claim common knowledge as official only when some 
> scientist has
> >written about it and stuck his name on it could have been a part of 
> the root
> >cause of such non-European anger amongst folks like Islam?   Who 
> was Al
> >Jabar?
> >
> >I guess I couldn't "call the whole thing off."    Well this is the 
> last I
> >will write on this thread.   If you want you can read the book, its 
> links
> >and references including the roots of what we call "liberal 
> democratic
> >theory."     It seems that they document what I have been saying 
> about the
> >roots which go back thousands of years in this place.    And what 
> they say
> >is short because it is one volume but it opens up old roots and 
> puts down
> >new ones and flowers mightily.
> >
> >REH
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Keith Hudson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "Ray Evans Harrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 3:23 PM
> >Subject: Re: [Futurework] Tragedy in Iran, too
> >
> >
> > > At 12:51 05/09/2003 -0400, you wrote:
> > > >I think the only problem you have is to assume that trade 
> creates
> eedom.
> > >
> > > I don't have a problem. I gave some historical evidence that 
> when Islam
> >was
> > > an active trading network in the Mediterranea it was a liberal 
> and
> > > scholarly regime.
> > >
> > > >I would respectfully suggest that is a typical western mistake. 
>   The
> > > >reverse is true.   Prosperity didn't create freedom for 
> pre-Columbian
> > > >America but prosperity flowed from the necessity for empathy 
> and respect
> >and
> > > >freedom was the result of both.   Trade naturally followed.   I 
> don't
> >think
> > > >you can make the case anywhere today that trade implies freedom 
> in fact
> >the
> > > >reverse is true in many cases where humans are enslaved to 
> create
> >efficient
> > > >trade.    Work doesn't make free.    Neither does trade.
> > >
> > > Would you please give some relevant historical evidence as I've 
> done, and
> > > then I might be able to understand you.
> > >
> > > Keith Hudson
> > >
> > > Keith Hudson, 6 Upper Camden Place, Bath, England,
> > > <www.evolutionary-economics.org>
> > >
> > >
> 
> Keith Hudson, 6 Upper Camden Place, Bath, England, 
> <www.evolutionary-economics.org>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Futurework mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
> 
> 

________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to