Hi Chris,
Check below...
----- Original Message -----
From: Christoph Reuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 5:42 AM
Subject: Re: [Futurework] "Spiritualität macht frei" ?
> Thanks for explaining, Natalia. I understood everything until you came to
> the bear example. Please bear with me for a couple of heretic questions:
>
>
> > But the Buddhist will tell you that the bear is
> > just imagined within an illusory world anyway, so it's not Selma
ignoring
> > reality that needs to be addressed, but your own habitual imaginings
that
> > have misused the bear to try to suppress Selma's creative process.
>
> Will the Buddhist also tell me that the CEO is
> just imagined within an illusory world anyway, so it's not worker-lemmings
> ignoring reality that needs to addressed, but my own habitual imaginings
that
> have misused the CEO to try to suppress the worker-lemming's creative
process
> (of watching CNN all nite to recover from the treadmill, I guess) ?
Yes. However, you needn't despair. The CEO has been collectively
imagined
just like the rest of this physical world. Long ago, all of the CEOs
were
beautiful dinosaurs, and today they have evolved into the most hideous
manifestation
of our ego thoughts. You are responding to these chaotic energies for
reasons
that could result in the complete restoration of the beautiful dinosaur
to that of CEO.
I would suggest that you'll find a lot of support from the Illuminati,
whose lizard form is
becoming more difficult to maintain anyway, what with all this
meditation that's going on.
> Next thing the Buddhist will tell me is to disappear in a mental
institution
> because "it's all in your head" and I'd better stop "misusing the CEO" ?
You're already in the mental institution--called planet Earth. It's up
to you
which cause you'll take form around, and hopefully it will be an
enjoyable one.
We're all insane or we wouldn't be here. Nothing should keep you from
trying to enlighten the lemmings. Perhaps you'll come to see that your
own
enlightenment rests with them, for we learn what we teach.
>
>
> > Within recent HIStory it is, with the exception of a few mostly unknown
> > compassionate tribal people, hard to make example of spiritual
enlightenment
> > leading to freedom of a recognized nation. However, before men took
over,
> > and matriarchy was the way of life, spirituality was the pulse and
respect
> > for life an integral part of its success.
>
> In recent HERtory (wasn't Tory Maggie Thatcher a she?) ...oops I meant
> HERstory, isn't it strange that the same nation that introduced the
> women's vote as late as 1971 (i.e. 680 years after the nation's
foundation)
> happens to be the only nation in Europe who only had 1 war in the last 500
> years, and also happens to be the originator of the global humanitarian
> treaty (Geneva Conventions) and organization (Red Cross) ?
> (Whereas nations of early emancipation like Germany ended up with "models
> of freedom and peace" like Hitler, mostly elected by women.)
"Mostly" women can mean, and probably does, a majority of 3000.
We do outnumber men, so it's not all that surprising. At the
time of Hitler, women round the world had to be very much attached to
their husbands' patriarchal ideas of what leadership was about. They
also
had been exposed to the same type of campaigning that today's
politicians
use to influence the populous. Advertising works. Besides, how could
Hitler
fail, given the financial contributions of Prescott Bush himself, not
to mention
other Western industrialists eager to help develop/industrialize the
bankrupt nation.
Women have indeed helped to vote in today's leaders, yet despite the
majority
the call is pretty close, and far too many nations do not allow women
the vote.
If there were more women to vote for, men in politics would practically
be
phased out. If women stopped voting in men, politics would change. I
realize
many women are erroneously moulded in the flawed system, and some men
are
compassionate enough to deserve our confidence, but the male track
record is
weak, and almost exclusively destructive. They all sound good in the
beginning,
if they have enough money to promote themselves. First clue--they have
enough
money to blow on political gain. I believe that Dubya will have
haplessly inspired
a pivotal point in the pattern of women's voting, world-wide. Let's
hope.
Later,
> Natalia
> Maybe now this thread can be renamed to "Matriarchat macht frei"?
>
> HERetically yours,
> Chris
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Futurework mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
