> You're living proof of where privatization leads to. > > Chris
Now, now Chris, you don't know that. I suspect you never met the man. For all you know he could be Selma in disguise on another e-mail. That's the fun of the internet. We could all be different from what we say. You are the power of your argument. My problem with Harry is that he seems to be practicing quoting his assumptions much too much to know them for sure. Or maybe he considers that we are all his high school class. Take him on for what he says, not for what you believe he is. I made the same mistake with you not so long ago and got in over my head in your language even though I've worked in it for many years. One has to give the other person the right to be themselves and when it is so difficult to know what is really being said underneathe it all, in your first langauge, writing and a second langauge is even funnier and more difficult albiet interesting. I'll never forget when I found out recently the meaning of "Fanny" in British. God only knows what I've been saying to Keith all these years. My wife just corrected me on three words for blacks that originated in the South and have lost their meaning in Oklahoma. We all say "Oh Boy" as in "hooray this is wonderful" but in the South it is a racial slur. And that is just English. Its a wonder that we can even type. REH ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christoph Reuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2003 5:31 PM Subject: [Futurework] Re: Logic 101 for Georgists > Harry, > > If what you say is true, then the Canadian minister for International Trade > spouted drivel. Else, a lecturer at a funny LA school that cannot even > afford its own domain name spouted drivel. The latter seems more likely, > especially if one logically examines the contents of what was said. > > You're living proof of where privatization leads to. > > Chris > > > Harry Pollard wrote: > > I said: > > > > "You thought, for some reason the Pettigrew quote was > > significant when actually it says nothing." > > > > It was: > > > > "In Ricardo's time, however, the factors of production were > > essentially immobile. This is no longer the case. In the new > > economy, all the decisive factors -- trade, production, > > technology, distribution, finance -- are integrated. On a world > > scale these factors are extremely mobile. Consequently, the > > effects of tree trade are no longer necessarily positive for > > everyone." > > > > This is the sort of drivel that is designed for people who have > > taken Logic 101 and consequently are unable to think for > > themselves. This forces them to take bits of not altogether > > coherent nonsense and present it as a revealed truth. > > > > No wonder you support the corporate protectionists against the > > people. > > > > Harry > > > > ******************************************** > > Henry George School of Social Science > > of Los Angeles > > Box 655 Tujunga CA 91042 > > Tel: 818 352-4141 -- Fax: 818 353-2242 > > http://haledward.home.comcast.net > > ******************************************** > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > SpamWall: Mail to this addy is deleted unread unless it contains the keyword > "igve". > > > _______________________________________________ > Futurework mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework > _______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
