Arthur,
 
I rather think that this "lack of guile" was what Americans reacted to during the debates with Al Gore. Bush "lost" only one - but even that one resulted in an increase in the poll figures for Bush.
 
I suppose that Reagan had this quality too, Whether or not people agreed with him, they felt he was telling it straight - the way he saw it.
 
This is why in his re-election he carried practically the whole country.
 
Harry
 
********************************************
Henry George School of Social Science
of Los Angeles
Box 655  Tujunga  CA  91042
Tel: 818 352-4141  --  Fax: 818 353-2242
http://haledward.home.comcast.net
******************************************** 
 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Bush the confidence trickster (was RE: [Futurework] Blair's curious illnesses

I think Bush (like Clinton) are a sort of Rohrshach test.  There is an immediate response to the person, mannerisms, smile, manner of walking, etc.  What all this means I will leave to the psychotherapists.
 
For me I found Clinton to be a lying sleaze.  Bush has a lack of guile that may be real or fake.  Probably a liar as well.  I don't know why but I like Bush better than Clinton, so far. 
 
arthur 
 
 
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.548 / Virus Database: 341 - Release Date: 12/5/2003

Reply via email to