I agree there should be a loose coupling between state and local governance
structures. The more space for citizens to define their futures
democratically, the better.  However, the state does have an active role to
play in defining equity standards and the nature of 'public space' (I think
I am correct in stating that citizens want to redefine their civic
involvement in a more active way that shares policy creation with the
politicians) to counter local bigotries that potentially could hijack local
education and suppress local democratic and sustainable initiatives that may
threaten local power structures., along with the provision of resources to
'have-not' areas.  In a project with which I am involved, I have seen local
curriculum and accountability initiatives heavily influenced by the
corporatist thinking of 'partners', such as Xerox, at one end, and by
progressive child development educationists, in another community where
democratic structures actively encouraged community outreach involving
teachers, parents, and community groups.  I will note that the idea of
contestation and difference does not bother me, in fact I would encourage it
as a sign of a healthy local democracy. If bureaucrates and technocrats feel
insecure, in the context, it likely means there are some creative things
happening.  My field work, however, led me to believe that this was less
likely to occur where the corporatist technological model was prevalent.
Too much secrecy and control. There is a space for the Canadian experiment
with federated thinking as a way of dealing with differences, subject to
minimal standards defined by the nation state.

BB
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ray Evans Harrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Christoph Reuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 7:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Foul-up in education


> I agree with Chris on this.   There are many things that the National and
> even International state can do around laws and equality but education is
> always local and the smaller and more specific the better.
>
> REH
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christoph Reuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 5:49 PM
> Subject: Re: [Futurework] Foul-up in education
>
>
> > Keith Hudson wrote:
> > > There'd be enough examples of good teachers in a state school who
> > > could attract good students from discerning parents if they could be
> > > released from the control of London. But the educationists have been
> afraid
> > > to try this so far because they know in the heart of hearts that
there'd
> be
> > > an overall improvement. It'll happen one day -- perhaps still quite a
> long
> > > way off for you because Canada is not so highly centralised as
England.
> >                                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > Here Keith is reaching the core of the issue.  The problem is
> centralization
> > rather than "state" as such.  But, you can have centralization in
private
> > corporations too --even more of it--, especially in large corporations.
> > And guess where increasing privatization and merger-mania leads to ?
> > So, even if private schools would be better than state schools as such,
> > it's just a matter of time that private school corporations become
> > vast and inefficient -- with the additional disadvantage of lacking
> > democratic checks and balances.
> >
> > As with the scary NHS horror stories:
> > The problem isn't "the state" but that poor Keith picked the wrong
state.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> >
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > SpamWall: Mail to this addy is deleted unread unless it contains the
> keyword
> > "igve".
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Futurework mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Futurework mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to