On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 02:47:37PM +0000, seventh guardian wrote: > On 12/30/06, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 03:01:22PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > >> On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 12:57:20PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > >> > On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 02:13:29AM +0000, seventh guardian wrote: > >> > [snip] > >> > > Ok, here goes the patch module_interface.c. The first goal of having > >a > >> > > functional system is hopefully done. > >> > > >> > I'm going to create a branch in cvs where we can apply, test and > >> > modify the patches. Don't bother to to the changes I posted > >> > earlier; I'll do it myself. > >> > > >> > The branch name will be "fvwm-module-struct-branch". To pull it > >> > from cvs into a directory "modstruct-branch", issue > >> > > >> > $ cvs co -Pd modstruct-branch -r fvwm-module-struct-branch fvwm > >> > >> I'm done proof-reading and cleaning up the code. > > > >See attachment for the complete module-struct patch. > > Hum it seems to be a problem with do_execute_module now. If for some > reason executing the module doesn't go correctly, the function exits > with a broken module still the list. I don't know if we should rely on > it being removed at some other place.. Maybe we should do it at the > spot.
I've already coded this a couple of days ago. Or do you see another leak? Ciao Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
