On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 12:24:14AM +0000, Thomas Adam wrote: > 2009/2/22 Thomas Adam <[email protected]>: > > 2009/2/21 Thomas Adam <[email protected]>: > >> Hi -- > >> > >> 2009/2/21 Dominik Vogt <[email protected]>: > >>> I've applied the patch after some modifications so that it's not > >>> necessary to copy window names etc. But the code in charmap.c > >>> needs some proof reading. I'm really not sur the memory > >>> management is correct. > >> > >> I was *just* this moment cleaning that up -- I will ditch my attempts > >> and take a look. > > > > Thanks for those improvements -- looks a little more sane now. I've > > gone and removed some of the calloc() stuff in print_bindings() which > > ought to make more sense now and commited those. > > > > Any problems, just shout -- I'm still a little cautious adding little > > things like this to FVWM for fear of completely buggering it up, > > although I suppose until someone shouts, I don't have to duck too low. > > :P > > Oh -- and umm, without wanting to sound too pushy, can we have a > 2.5.27 unstable release soon? I've read through the instructions in > CVS on how to do this (assuming they're up to date) and whilst I could > probably do it, I feel neither that confident,
It's very easy if you follow the instruction in doc/DEVELOPER precisely. > nor that I have the > right to enforce such a decision, but I do think it's something which > is due, especially as more and more stuff is added in CVS now. :) We should make the print_bindings patch stable first. When we're confident the patch is good, I can make the release on the fly. Ciao Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt
