Dominik Vogt <[email protected]> writes: > On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 12:28:11AM +0000, Thomas Adam wrote: >> Can we then officially retire the Jitterbug? It's awful, no longer >> maintained upstream, and frankly we had a much better success rate >> tracking bugs on this mailing list. > > That's fine with me. We never really used it properly.
If I recall correctly it was pretty good until it got overwhelmed with spam. We used to get mails to the list along with the Jitterbug submission, now it's just a black hole. As far as 2.6, I think the primary thing missing is the conversion script for changing 2.4 config files to 2.6.
