2009/8/2 <[email protected]>: > On Thursday, 30. July 2009, Christoph Fritz wrote: > >> I'll send an updated version later this week. >> > > voila
This looks good. I can understand why the enum in the snap_attraction_t struct exists -- and I suppose if anyone in the future wanted to do something with enum types directly they can do, otherwise they can just use the named constants directly without requiring to go via the struct in the first place. So I've applied this, having tested it -- also corrected a few typos and phrasings in the documentation. I don't suppose anyone will have any major objections -- if they do, they'll no doubt scream anyway. :) -- Thomas Adam
