On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 08:19:43PM +0000, Thomas Adam wrote: > Now that fvwm-convert-2.6 is underway, and attempts to do something vaguely > useful, I am aware that I will have to look at the purify tests we have and > update them to bring them inline with all the new features FVWM 2.5.X has. > > This is no small task -- so before I think about doing it: > > * Is it worth me at all even bothering? We've had so many new features, and > yet almost no one has ever updated these tests when that feature has been > added. > > * If there were any regressions from new features which didn't have any > corresponding purify tests, someone would have said so by now. > > Something needs doing to these though to help push towards FVWM 2.6.0 -- I > don't mind doing the work, I am just curious to know if we should for a > stable release. If not, which areas are worth concentrating more on? The > style section alone would take me ages, for instance. :P
I tried to cover most of the existing functionality and syntax in an aggressive way, when I wrote these tests. Of course they don't cover any new features, and I think adding tests is a good thing. Ciao Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt
