All, I said before Christmas 2009, I didn't want to do this. But I think we've seen a number of sufficient changes in CVS since then which makes me question whether I should undertake the release process and issue a new unstable 2.5.29 release.
What do others think? The only odd quirk I can see with doing so is that I put a shoddy fvwm-convert-2.6 script in there, which might well confuse some end-users, although if they use it, so much the better I suppose. I wouldn't want them to get the wrong idea from the presence of that file that 2.6.0 was somehow present. ;) -- Thomas Adam -- "It was the cruelest game I've ever played and it's played inside my head." -- "Hush The Warmth", Gorky's Zygotic Mynci.
