On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 01:12:25PM -0400, [email protected] wrote:
> Thomas Adam <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 02:20:24PM -0400, [email protected] wrote:
> >> Thomas Adam <[email protected]> writes:
> >>
> >> > On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 12:06:33PM -0400, [email protected] wrote:
> >> >> Thomas Adam <[email protected]> writes:
> >> >
> >> > Agreed -- it should only mean a change to SetRCDefaults() -- can you do
> >> > this, please? Would you mind?
> >>
> >> I love when things go smoothly.
> >>
> >> This is not one of those times.
> >>
> >> I haven't updated in a while so I updated, made changes and
> >> restarted.
> >>
> >> Now my fonts have stopped working:
> >>
> >> I have this:
> >>
> >> MenuStyle "*" Font "xft:Sans:bold:antialias=False:pixelsize=15",
> >> Animation, Hilight3DThin
> >>
> >> And I get this messages:
> >>
> >> [fvwm][FlocaleLoadFont]: WARNING -- can't load font
> >> 'xft:Sans:bold:antialias=False:pixelsize=15', trying default:
> >>
> >> -*-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed-*-13-*-*-*-*-*-*-*,-*-fixed-medium-r-normal-*-14-*-*-*-*-*-*-*,-*-*-medium-r-normal-*-16-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
> >>
> >> Can't tell if it's a problem on my end or not.
> >
> > It was my own f*** up. Can you "cvs up" and see if that solves it for you?
>
> Yes, fixed now.
>
> I still get this warning:
>
> [fvwm][FlocaleGetFontSet]: (9x15bold) Missing font charsets:
> ISO8859-2, ISO8859-3, ISO8859-4, ISO8859-5, KOI8-R, ISO8859-7, ISO8859-9,
> ISO8859-13, ISO8859-14, ISO8859-15, JISX0208.1983-0, KSC5601.1987-0,
> GB2312.1980-0, JISX0201.1976-0, ISO10646-1
>
> from
>
> MenuStyle StartMenu Greyed navy, font 9x15bold, TrianglesRelief
>
> I don't think it's new, but while we are on the subject...
It's because the font doesn't have the right charset encodings for the
specified locale -- the equivalent to 9x15 is somewhere in the helvetica
range (IIRC). It's not a problem per se for you, it's just what FVWM does
to (unhelpfully) inform you of this. If you want, I can take a look at
"PrintInfo locale 2", assuming you put the output here.
So, other than that, how do we stand now?
I'm still thinking about putting at RCs first, and then something completely
official thereafter assuming we have enough adoptors of these RCs, although
given the lifetime of 2.5.X anyway, with the releases that's already had, we
might be OK.
There's still more important things surrounding this, such as release
announcements. This is surprisingly a big thing, given that it's been,
what, tfive years since the last proper stable release? This is a huge thing,
given the features in 2.4.X and 2.5.X -- I'm not happy about writing such a
thing either, to be honest. :)
Any takers?
-- Thomas Adam
--
"Deep in my heart I wish I was wrong. But deep in my heart I know I am
not." -- Morrissey ("Girl Least Likely To" -- off of Viva Hate.)
