On 20 April 2011 09:34, Thomas Funk <[email protected]> wrote: > Btw thanks for releasing fvwm 2.6 :-) . Perhaps 2.7 is going in a more > freshen future ;-)
There won't be a 2.7 in the same sense of "unstable" as was the case in 2.5.X -- Thomas Adam
On 20 April 2011 09:34, Thomas Funk <[email protected]> wrote: > Btw thanks for releasing fvwm 2.6 :-) . Perhaps 2.7 is going in a more > freshen future ;-)
There won't be a 2.7 in the same sense of "unstable" as was the case in 2.5.X -- Thomas Adam