Thomas Adam <tho...@fvwm.org> writes: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 05:48:25PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: >> Thomas Adam <tho...@fvwm.org> writes: >> >> > On 19 July 2012 22:11, Dan Espen <des...@verizon.net> wrote: >> >> I'm guessing the other fvwm developers are okay with going to asciidoc? >> > >> > No. I have an attempt at this, but it's not finished. We either use >> > groff or nothing, and I don't mean groff backported from some >> > conversion tool. If you don't know groff, start learning. >> >> I thought since you were making the attempt, you thought asciidoc would >> be a good direction to go in. > > Yes it will be when it's ready. It's pretty much done, bar some plugging in > scripts so it builds. But until I can finish that and then rip out the > other docs, having it in Asciidoc means we can't use it, and that's bad.
If we add an asciidoc file, I'd expect the Makefile to be modified to produce the man page or html as required. -- Dan Espen
