> I'm happy to commit, providing I understand what it was for and why I > suggested the change; it was almost a year ago, after all.
Yeah, I am pulling this topic out of cold storage. Sorry about that. Besides the link that I just sent out, the other key piece of the conversation is probably this email: http://www.mail-archive.com/fvwm-workers@lists.math.uh.edu/msg15641.html It was a pretty short e-mail chain; I suggested just commenting out/deleting a chunk of code (which is understandably less than ideal), and based on feedback I converted the patch to a bug opt. The third iteration is the patch involving FP_IS_LENIENT that you (Thomas) suggested. Let me know what you think. Thanks, Jonathan
