On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 09:12:26PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 09:12:48PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 07:44:10PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: > > > On 14 April 2013 09:57, Dominik Vogt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 03:41:48AM -0500, [email protected] wrote: > > > >> CVSROOT: /home/cvs/fvwm > > > >> Module name: fvwm > > > >> Changes by: domivogt 13/04/14 03:41:48 > > > > > > None of these changes seem to be following the fvwm-2_6 branch. Is > > > this intentional? I did spend a while before fixing up a bunch of > > > warnings. Not sure if I've already done so or not with the version of > > > GCC you claim to be using, but I don't think you're looking at the > > > correct branch point in CVS for starters. > > > > I'm looking at the main branch. > > Right; it has to be branch-2_6.
Then why was it forked in the first place? Ciao Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt
