On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 02:08:44PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: > Not sure I want to work in the mvwm tree. > Not fond of the name,
Neither me, but more because the "M" gets in the way with tab completion in the subsirs (also matches Makefile*). > and don't want to see FvwmCPP go away. But the module is already back. :-) I think at the moment it should also be possible to add the fvwm modules to the module path and use them with the new core. If not, I'm interested in finding out what has to be done to make them compatible. Fvwm probably has some compatibility check that might prevent it. Ciao Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt
