On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 09:44:44PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 03:16:07PM +0100, Olivier Chapuis wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 10:50:48AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 11:57:17AM +0100, fvwm-workers wrote: > > > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 09:07:51PM +0100, Olivier Chapuis wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 03:23:37AM -0600, FVWM CVS wrote: > > > > > > CVSROOT: /home/cvs/fvwm > > > > > > Module name: fvwm > > > > > > Changes by: domivogt 01/12/13 03:23:37 > > > > > > > > > > > > Modified files: > > > > > > . : NEWS > > > > > > modules : ChangeLog > > > > > > modules/FvwmButtons: FvwmButtons.c > > > > > > > > > > > > Log message: > > > > > > * Actions can be bound to windows swallowed in FvwmButtons. > > > > > > > > > I do not think it is difficult to add a GrabedAction command. > > I can add it if you want. > > The new behaviour is now the default, but you can disable it with > the new option "ActionIgnoresClientWindow", e.g. > > *FvwmButtons(Action beep, ActionIgnoresClientWindow, \ > Swallow xload "exec xload") > > Is that good enough? I think breaking the use of that > undocumented old behaviour for shaped windows is a rare occurance, > but it helps a lot for new users that try to get the new > functionality. Can we agree about this approach? >
Yes for me, Olivier -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
