On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 12:35:18PM +0100, fvwm-workers wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 10:58:59AM +0000, Tim Phipps wrote:
> > Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
> > uname output: SunOS silver 5.5.1 Generic_103640-38 sun4u sparc
> > SUNW,Ultra-5_10
> > Compiler: gcc
> > Compilation CFLAGS: -g -O2 -Wall -Wno-implicit-int
> > prefix: /u/phippst/sunos
> >
> > FVWM Version: 2.5.0
> > FVWM_MODULEDIR: /u/phippst/sunos/libexec/fvwm/2.5.0
> > FVWM_DATADIR: /u/phippst/sunos/share/fvwm
> > FVWM_USERDIR: /u/phippst/.fvwm
> >
> > Description:
> > The PlacementOverlapPenalities style doesn't work for me,
> > whatever I try I get:
> >
> > [FVWM][CMD_Style]: <<ERROR>> Bad style option: PlacementOverlapPenalities
> >
> > The man page states that up to six positive or null decimal
> > arguments may be used but the code has this (style.c):
> >
> > float f[6] = {-1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1};
> > Bool bad = False;
> >
> > found = True;
> > num = 0;
> > if (rest != NULL)
> > {
> > num = sscanf(rest, "%f %f %f %f %f %f",
> > &f[0], &f[1], &f[2], &f[3], &f[4], &f[5]);
> > for(i=0; i < num; i++)
> > {
> > if (f[i] < 0)
> > bad = True;
> > }
> > }
> > if (bad)
> > {
> > fvwm_msg(ERR, "CMD_Style",
> > "Bad argument to PlacementOverlapPenalties: %s", rest);
> > break;
> > }
>
> Works fine for me, at least if I correct the typo in the style
> name:
>
> > Repeat-By:
> >
> > Style * PlacementOverlapPenalities 1 10 0 1 0.5 10
> ^^^
Hm, that doesn't explain the error message you get. BTW, is there
a specific reason why negative penalties are not allowed?
Bye
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LifeBits Aktiengesellschaft, Albrechtstr. 9, D-72072 Tuebingen
fon: ++49 (0) 7071/7965-0, fax: ++49 (0) 7071/7965-20
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the
body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
