On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 10:51:47AM +0100, fvwm-workers wrote: > On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 10:13:01PM -0500, Jacob Morzinski wrote: > > Third aspect: particular points which SHOULD NOT produce complaints > > > > Two points are particularly bad: xbm files, and missing keysyms. > > > > > > Fvwm2.4 will print a complaint each time it loads a xbm file. As a > > policy issue, does fvwm support xbm files or not? If it does, it > > shouldn't complain when it loads one (and the complaint certainly > > shouldn't be an ERROR, since the load succeeds). > > > > The complaint is "<<ERROR>> XpmReadFileToXpmImage failed". There's a > > simple techincal reason for the diagnostic complaint (fvwm tries the xpm > > loader before trying the xbm loader). But from a policy point of view, > > a program that supports xbm's should not complain when it successfully > > loads an error-free file. > > I'll look into that. I wasn't aware of that problem.
Fixed. Bye Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] LifeBits Aktiengesellschaft, Albrechtstr. 9, D-72072 Tuebingen fon: ++49 (0) 7071/7965-0, fax: ++49 (0) 7071/7965-20 -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
