On 15 Mar 2002 14:19:50 +0000, Tim Phipps wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > That's because someone thought it would be a good idea to add the > > "quiet" option after the command string. I agree that this is > > most unfortunate. Should we break compatibility here? > > I vote yes since I've never used the quiet option, it only puts messages > in the log file and you can easily get the same effect with >/dev/null.
I hope you don't suggest to break the current first argument. I don't worry if the second argument "quiet" is removed. But it is not hard to strip leading and trailing quotes that can't start a shell command anyway. Again I don't worry if the \` inside backticks is not expanded to a simply backtick as it is not. Regards, Mikhael. -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
