On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 09:30:42PM +0100, Olivier Chapuis wrote: > On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 10:49:01PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > Apart from the apparent bugs (windowshade doesn't do anything, > > the border layout of small windows is screwed, window corners > > sometimes flash above the parent during opaque resizing), what do > > you think about the now code (mostly in terms of speed, but feel > > free to comment on other aspects too)? > > > > The big difference for me with the now code is that the borders > do not filcker at all during an opaque resize. This is really > a big progress IMHO. If a similar progress arise with the title > I think that fvwm will has a perfect resize operation.
I hope I'll get it done this weekend. > About speed I can not say a lot as I never see speed problems > with the old code. In the mean time I tested it myself at work where I have a much slower machine with a lousy video driver. There is a *big* difference between 2.4.x and current CVS in terms of speed. Bye Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] LifeBits Aktiengesellschaft, Albrechtstr. 9, D-72072 Tuebingen fon: ++49 (0) 7071/7965-0, fax: ++49 (0) 7071/7965-20 -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
