On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 01:14:46PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: > On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 12:20:45PM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote: > > On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 10:12:57AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > > On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 10:22:13PM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote: > > > > About average and tinting. Tint/TintMask allows to tint a pixmap, > > > > my pbs is: do we have to compute the average bg after tinting > > > > or not. With Tint, as the bg is also tinted, it seems that we have > > > > to compute the average bg before tinting (but sh/hi maybe "wrong") > > > > as with TintMask nothing is clear for me. > > > > > > Can you post a few examples that demonstrate the new features? > > > > > > > If it is the Tint feature you are intersted on here an example: > > > > Colorset 50 TiledPixmap background/fvwm-flying.xpm, NoTint > > Colorset 51 TiledPixmap background/fvwm-flying.xpm, Tint blue 20 > > Colorset 52 TiledPixmap background/fvwm-flying.xpm, Tint yellow 20 > > Colorset 53 TiledPixmap background/fvwm-flying.xpm, Tint black 30 > > > > DestroyModuleConfig FvwmBacker: * > > *FvwmBacker: Command (Desk 0) Colorset 50 > > *FvwmBacker: Command (Desk 1) Colorset 51 > > *FvwmBacker: Command (Desk 2) Colorset 52 > > *FvwmBacker: Command (Desk 3) Colorset 53 > > > > So one xpm and 4 differents backgrounds for the 4 desks I use. > > Now an example where average/contrast come into play with tint: > > > > # standard item > > Colorset 17 fg contrast, bg average, \ > > TiledPixmap background/stone.xpm, NoShape > > # active item > > Colorset 18 fg contrast, bg average, \ > > TiledPixmap background/stone.xpm, Tint red 30, NoShape > > # iconified item > > Colorset 19 fg contrast, bg average, \ > > TiledPixmap background/stone.xpm, Tint white 30, NoShape > > # pointed item > > Colorset 20 fg contrast, bg average, \ > > TiledPixmap background/stone.xpm, NoShape > > # modules special background > > Colorset 12 fg black, bg rgb:80/A0/A0, \ > > Transparent, NoShape > > > > *FvwmIconMan: *colorset 12 > > *FvwmIconMan: *iconcolorset 19 > > *FvwmIconMan: *plaincolorset 17 > > *FvwmIconMan: *selectcolorset 20 > > *FvwmIconMan: *focuscolorset 18 > > *FvwmIconMan: *focusandselectcolorset 20 > > > > So again one xpm and various colors. plain iconman buttons are > > ok. But, at the present time, others does not have good fg,sh and hi > > colours as stone.xpm gives a dark average bg colors and the corresponding > > sh, hi and contrast colors are computed from this colors. For example > > all contrast fg colorset are almost white which is not correct for colorset > > 19 which has grey bg in the average. > > Very nice. However, FvwmIconMan does not refresh the transparent > parts of the background when they are obscured and revealed again. >
I cannot reproduce this. Do you use the ParenatlRelativity style? This style must be set for any apps which use a transparent colorset. I've a plan to do this automaticaly. Olivier -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
