On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 03:18:35PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: > Olivier Chapuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 01:34:53PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: > > > > > > So, I tried it out. > > > I was surprised to see that the shadow descends down below the > > > character. Isn't the effect in FvwmScript the opposite, > > > Ie. the shadow is above the letters? > > >
In fact FvwmScript relief is equivalent to "shadowsize=1" and Colorset fgsh [csX.hi]. > > > Since thats where I want the shadow, I tried using negative > > > numbers. That didn't seem to work. Large negative numbers are > > > interesting, they can make the titlebar disappear. > > > > Yep, not yet implemented :o) > > Fair enough. > Do you mean that we do not need "negative shadow text"? > > > Shouldn't the shadow stuff be at the end of the font name along > > > with the other modifiers? > > > > I do not think so (for coding simplicity). Note that the "xft:" modifier > > is at the "begining". > > Yep, I re-read the man page, and I agree, the front is OK. > > Its not clear what happens with a list: > > "shadowsize=2:9x15,fixed" > > or > > "shadowsize=2:9x15,shadowsize=2:fixed" > > it looks like it accepts either, but ignores the second > shadowsize. > "shadowsize=int:" should be at the beginning only. It will be complicate (impossible) to support shadowsize in a "," separated list as such list is given directly to XLoadFontSet (and X choose itself the good font relatively to the locale charset). Olivier -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]