Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 08:34:33PM +0000, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> > On 06 Oct 2002 14:32:16 -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Log message:
> > > > * fvwm.1: use "fvwm" spelling in the middle of sentences for consistenc
> > > 
> > > I guess I did that, sorry.
> > > Fvwm is a proper noun and capitalization is probably correct,
> > > but I don't have a strong preference. Its our proper noun and
> > > I suppose we can do whatever we want with it.
> > 
> > I only converted what Dominik would convert anyway. I myself never write
> > "Fvwm" even in the beginning of the sentence. Either "FVWM" (acronym) or
> > "fvwm" (package/executable name) just like with GNOME, KDE, CDE or GNU
> > I would never write Gnu or Kde. But this is only my humble preferences.
> 
> I really don't care much about capitalizing it or not, but
> constantly mixing "fvwm" and "Fvwm" is bad.  I once chose to use
> the lower case version everywhere for consistency.  By the way,
> the phrase/word "built-in" appeared for the same reason.  All
> three spellings appeared many times in the various man pages, so
> I just changed them all to "built-in" which was what ispell
> suggested.  My dictionary also lists "built-in" as the adjective
> for "to build in".  It does not mention "builtin".

Gee, now I'm going to blame ispell (under XEmacs) which says
"BUILTIN is correct", but when I try to spell check
"built-in", it just says "BUILT is correct".

My dictionary agrees with yours.

-- 
Dan Espen                           E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the
body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to