On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 02:05:17PM +0000, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > On 01 Nov 2002 15:06:22 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > > > By the way, I think all the > > > > ...Strut > > > > stuff is misnamed. It should all be named > > > > ...Struts > > ^^^ > > I think it should follow the same logic as Border/NoBorder
Border and NoBorder were okay as long as the whole border was treated as a single object. When it gets split into four parts, is should be Borders and NoBorders. The struts are four separate things by design. > (I hope we will > have side border options: !TitleBorder, !SideBorders, !OppositeBorder). Later. > > And I think > > > > PlacementOverlap(Percent)Penalties > > > > should be renamed to > > > > MinOverlap(Percent)PlacementPenalties > > This would be more intuitive. > > > So, don't be surprised when the old names stop working in future > > 2.5.x releases. > > > > Also, I think the arguments of the EwmhBaseStrut command should > > use "percent of screen size" as the default unit, not "pixels", > > since virtually all other commands work like this. The new > > syntax would the be > > > > EwmhBaseStrut 0p 576p 0p 432p > > To be honest, I would break compatibility (maybe in 3.0?) and use points > for numbers without suffix and percents for numbers with '%' suffix. I.e.: > > 48 - 48 points (currently percents) > 48p - 48 points > 48% - 48 percents (currently not really supported, but it works) > > I think, it is good to add support for '%' in our geometry too. I have no objections against an additional '%' suffix. But the problem with breaking compatibility here is that it is virtually impossible to write a script that converts existing configs to the new syntax. Bye Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
