Mikhael Goikhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 11 Dec 2002 11:36:40 -0500, Dan Espen wrote: > > It seems like a very useful thing to have a list like that, > > but it seems like a bad idea to keep it separate from the > > fvwm source code or the fvwm man page. Its going to > > get out of sync. > > > > I don't plan to do anything like that right now. > > I'm just sharing some thoughts. > > I don't think having such comment line in the man page is the best. > > I initialy created COMMANDS from functable.c, the man page is less > reliable. If any automation is to be done, I think, it is adding > 52-char description in functable.c near every command in the list.
The closer to the source code, the better. But: There are commands in functable.c that are not meant for the end user, for example "set_mask". An additional flag in the macro call could solve that. The one line description is very close to the first sentence in the man page that describes the command. Very likely they could be identical. A program that used functable.c to generate parts of fvwm.1.in could solve that too. -- Dan Espen E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
