Olivier Chapuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 03:39:57PM -0500, Dan Espen wrote:
> > Ben Sferrazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I've previously written about this problem, but I have yet to solve it. 
> > >  I cannot get FVWM to properly display XPM pixmaps at their original 
> > > color depth (they appear to be at most 8-bit).  I've tried running 
> > > 2.4.13, 2.5.4, and 2.5.5, all on a Sun UltraSPARC Solaris 2.7 system.  I 
> > > built FVWM with xpm-3.4k and libpng-1.2.5, and after running configure 
> > > it's reported that xpm and png support was successfully included. 
> > >  Running make and make install seem to go without a problem.  My system 
> > > certainly supports 24-bit colordepth, as I have no problem viewing these 
> > > XPM pixmaps with 'xv', and am able to view all PNGs with GIMP.  Am I 
> > > overlooking something here?  Are not enough colors being allocated for 
> > > fvwm, and if so, how can this be changed?  I should also mention that I 
> > > am not even able to view any PNG icons with fvwm-2.5.x.  For instance, 
> > > "Style xterm Icon dtterm.png" doesn't give me any icon, despite having 
> > > the Imagepath pointing to the location of the png file.  Any help to 
> > > resolve these issues is greatly appreciated.  thanks.
> > 
> > Looking thru the mail archive, the last thing I see is a request
> > that you send the output of xdpyinfo and the PrintInfo colors
> > fvwm command.
> > 
> > Most likely your display card supports both 8 and 24 bit visuals
> > at the same time.  Fvwm is probably picking the 8 bit visual.
> > 
> 
> I switch to the fvwm-workers.
> 
> It seems that these cards which support both 8 and 24 depth do not
> have 2 hardwares cmaps, so the auto-detection I try to implement is
> useless.  I think that if the default visual has depth 8 (and no fvwm
> visual option is used), then we can try to see if there is a TrueColor
> depth > 8 visual and if it is the case use this "best" visual.  Dan
> what do you think?

Sounds good to me.

Sun is making the default visual 8 because there are still a few
apps that won't work at anything but 8 bit.  I see no problem
with apps ignoring the default visual and using the best visual.

-- 
Dan Espen                           E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the
body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to