> I would like to have this patch applied, but I don't have enough time to
> do this now.
Ok, thanks.
> Probably the option name should be different.
> How about having 2 options UpRelief and DownRelief with values
> "flat", "none", "raised" and "sunken" ("flat" is different from "none"
> in that it consumes Frame space, but I am not sure this is needed).
These options would make the possibility of negative frame values obsolete,
right ? This approach allows more control over the relief, although i'm not
sure if someone would ever need that much possibilities of relief (e.g.
having both up and down state sunken).
> I don't know. This abs() line seems to be even in 2.2.x.
> But negative frame worked in 2.4.x as stated in the man page.
> I think this bug (always raised-looking relief) is somewhere else.
Weird. Because IIRC, removing this line seemed to remove the bug.
cheers,
Remko
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the
body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
