Hi there, On 28 Apr 2003 at 08:23:32 +0200, Uwe Pross wrote:
> I have not made a decision yet. My current concept (in > mind) is partinioning the functions as the are now in > layout_default.inc in files and add some dependencies to > this functions ... This concept was not that good. I had set this up on my computer and had some tries. I realized that it uses even more cpu load than the class concept which I like more since it is structured. I made some performance messurements which showed that the class concept needs about 5 percent more cpu load on the server than the current function concept. I think that's resonable - I'd like to go with that. I have ported the current default layout from May 1. The last changes Bob made should be included. Currently I have got the following files: web-theme/classes/base_class.inc // base class description web-theme/classes/default_class.inc // class for default theme web-theme/classes/plain_class.inc // class for plain theme web-theme/helpers/members2globals.inc // converter definitions web-theme/themes/default_theme.inc // theme file web-theme/themes/plain_theme.inc // theme file The theme files are almost ready. I think the conv_link_target function has to be adapted only. The new class/theme files will be used if ?theme instead of ?layout is used in the url: http://www.fvwm.org/?theme=default // white pager to see the difference http://www.fvwm.org/?theme=plain // different navigation style I commited it today so that changes on the layout files can be made on the new files as well. Regards, Uwe -- ,_, Uwe Pross (O,O) mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( ) http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~uwp =-"-"-================================ -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
