On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 04:13:53PM +0300, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > On 03 Sep 2003 13:04:33 +0200, Uwe Pross wrote: > > > > On 03 Sep 2003 at 09:59:02 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > > > > > * It is practically difficult to score hundreds of logos at once > > > > > > Most of the logos are series of the same logo in various formats. > > > > Which makes it even more difficult since votes for different > > logos of a serie should be count together. > > > > > > We have 3 (or in some rare cases more) best artists who get the largest > > > > number of points. > > > > > > > > Second stage. Choosing 1 best logo. > > > > > > It may be problematic to make people vote twice. > > > > That's right. It might be too complicated since there are > > two deadlines. > > You don't need to get the deadlines too precisely. We didn't expect to > get hundreds of logos back then.
Ritght. But there really should be a NEWS entry on the web page that the submission period is over and that due to the amount of contributed logos, voting will be delayed a bit. > It is interesting that you say in another message that you don't have a > time to create one good overview image, but still want to go with one > stage voting that requeres a lot of clean-up work, literally going > through all hundreds of images and splitting them in some cases and > grouping them in other cases, so different variants appear as one logo. > Much *much* harder than creating overview for every artist, which is > already almost ready. Anyway, since it is you that do most of the work, > your thoughts have more weight. Ciao Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
