"Viktor Griph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Scott Smedley wrote: > > > Hi Dominik, > > > >> Can you have multiple peridic commands or just one? > > > > Multiple. > > > >> I suggest to replace the command "Periodic" with some option to the Schedu > le > >> command > > > > The current specification for Schedule is: > > > > Schedule delay_ms [command_id] command > > > > So, would something like the following do? > > > > Schedule delay_ms [command_id] ["Periodic"] command > > > > Perhaps someone has a better suggestion? > > > > I think the above is good. The only problem with it is that if someone has > a function named Periodic and use to execute that with Schedulte the above > will break that config. One way to avoid that, and also give room for more > possible options to Schedule in the future, is to put options before the > delay. That way any string before the delay number could be read as an > option. So > > Schedule [Periodic] delay_ms [command_id] command > > would be a possible easier to parse syntax.
How about: Schedule delay_ms x repeat_ms [command_id] command Ie: Schedule 1000 x 2000 .... Schedule x 5000 .... -- Dan Espen E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
